Age of solar system needs a fresh look
in [Physics]
|
Prev: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
Next: best way to trashcan Nebular-dust-cloud is **neighborhood star ages** Re: (use in 4th) Earth about 10 billion yrs old; Atom Totality theory (use in 4th)
From: Sam Wormley on 1 Jan 2010 01:37 Age of solar system needs a fresh look http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/52306/title/Age_of_solar_system_needs_a_fresh_look Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest stage of formation.
From: Uncle Al on 1 Jan 2010 12:08 Sam Wormley wrote: > > Age of solar system needs a fresh look > http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/52306/title/Age_of_solar_system_needs_a_fresh_look > Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest > stage of formation. "Historical estimates place the age at about 4.5 billion years" "recent calculations place the age at more like 4.5672 billion years" "this difference is important in understanding the infant solar system" A 1.5% relative increase overturning our "understanding" of anything composed of conjecture is bullshit. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: BradGuth on 1 Jan 2010 20:56
On Dec 31 2009, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Age of solar system needs a fresh lookhttp://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/52306/title/Age_of_solar_s... > Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest > stage of formation. Too bad my paramagnetic basalt moon rocks don't agree with NASA's moon rocks. Wonder why our moon(Selene) is so much more radioactive than Earth. Of course anything derived from the Sirius(B) nova would be newer and thus more radioactive. ~ BG |