Prev: The Schwartz space
Next: What are space, and time for BP's cap&trade nostrum (circa Waxman's '91 bill on acid rain)
From: spudnik on 25 Jul 2010 21:22 Al Gore, whose career (and Senior's) was created by Occidental, lost the Michigan primary (but got the caucus) and also lost Arkansas general election -- by disenfranchizing 53,000 voters in the Dem primary & violating the Voting Rights Act o'65 -- that Senior had to be dragged into signing -- again, over his margin of loss to Dubya. also, the Consortium of papers ultimately showed, he'd have lost in Florida with a recount -- and, he brought the whole BvG "anonymous decision" on himself, by filing the first suit: state law already would have mandated a recount, if it were as close as it was, anyway. in other words, he blew off both of his feet; and that, folks, is the Liberal Media, oWned by consWervatives. thus: problem is, it may be being "instituted" around us, as with the President's (2003) CCX, and the 2005 ICE, both of which are based in "the City" of London (although the latter is HQd is Atlanta, it is based *juridicially* in England). also, this is all old-hat, the same as Waxman's '91 bill on acid rain, whether or not that was mandatory. the only answer, that I can see, is a tariff on all imported froms of energy, esp. "renewables," because it is a sic joke to "import renewables," in the first place -- and I include the so-called Fossilized Fuels (TM), because there is little difference between diesel & biodiesel e.g., other than the bouquet -- child-tested on film! > C) The US Congress will not pass this legislation this year. It is > clear that the liberals will lose many seats in the upcoming election > and prospects for passage in the future are nill. thus: I have no idea what (N-k) is supposed to do, and I don't googol ****, partly because of a restraining order; unfortunately, I'm using their front-end for these NGs. <deletia impletum> thus: 3 choices, 2 choices, 1 choices (3?, or "three summorial" .-) yeah, direction cosines are nice & homogenous, but why not stay with vectors (quaternions' inner & outer products) ?? thus: IFF probably is "if & only if," that is to say, Liebniz's neccesity & sufficiency, used in literate manner! > Iff ... then ... --les ducs d'oil! http://tarpley.net --Stop BP's cap&trade looting & toss them out of USA waters! http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 26 Jul 2010 15:21 and, of course, disenfranchizing past felons was also against the law, and Gore didn't do anything about that; did he? > Wrong newsfroup, --les ducs d'oil! http://tarpley.net --Stop BP's cap&trade looting & toss them out of USA waters! http://wlym.com
From: Stephen Morgan on 26 Jul 2010 21:20
"spudnik" <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d726873f-fcc8-45a0-8504-9003f6870b3c(a)y12g2000prb.googlegroups.com... > and, of course, disenfranchizing past felons > was also against the law, and Gore didn't do anything > about that; did he? > >> Wrong newsfroup, > > --les ducs d'oil! > http://tarpley.net > > --Stop BP's cap&trade looting & toss them out of USA waters! > http://wlym.com Wrong newsfroup again, you spamming rectum load of boar semen. |