Prev: why Peano Axioms never had Frontview & Backview #291 CorrectingMath
Next: Helmholtz equation and the Maximum Principle
From: Leonid Lenov on 12 Jan 2010 07:32 Hello, How much is Aleph_0 ^ Aleph_0? Is it equal to Aleph_1? Thanks in advance.
From: Tonico on 12 Jan 2010 07:39 On Jan 12, 2:32 pm, Leonid Lenov <leonidle...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > How much is Aleph_0 ^ Aleph_0? Is it equal to Aleph_1? > Thanks in advance. Put A:= Aleph_o, c = the continuum cardinality,then: c = 2^A <= A^A <= (2^A)^A = 2^(A^2) = 2^A = c By Bernstein-Schroeder's theorem, A^A = c Tonio
From: William Elliot on 12 Jan 2010 07:47 On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Tonico wrote: > On Jan 12, 2:32�pm, Leonid Lenov <leonidle...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> How much is Aleph_0 ^ Aleph_0? Is it equal to Aleph_1? Yes, assuming the continuum hypothesis. > Put A:= Aleph_o, c = the continuum cardinality,then: > > c = 2^A <= A^A <= (2^A)^A = 2^(A^2) = 2^A = c > > By Bernstein-Schroeder's theorem, A^A = c Theorem. GCH. Proof. Occam's Razor.
From: Leonid Lenov on 12 Jan 2010 08:29 On Jan 12, 1:47 pm, William Elliot <ma...(a)rdrop.remove.com> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Tonico wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2:32 pm, Leonid Lenov <leonidle...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> How much is Aleph_0 ^ Aleph_0? Is it equal to Aleph_1? > > Yes, assuming the continuum hypothesis. If we do not assume the continuum hypothesis is Tonico's argument still valid to show that Aleph_0 ^ Aleph_0 <= Aleph_1?
From: A N Niel on 12 Jan 2010 09:33 In article <6f00e4d9-ae47-4a4a-97d3-1d245d84e017(a)c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, Leonid Lenov <leonidlenov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 12, 1:47�pm, William Elliot <ma...(a)rdrop.remove.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Tonico wrote: > > > On Jan 12, 2:32�pm, Leonid Lenov <leonidle...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> How much is Aleph_0 ^ Aleph_0? Is it equal to Aleph_1? > > > > Yes, assuming the continuum hypothesis. > > If we do not assume the continuum hypothesis is Tonico's argument > still valid to show that Aleph_0 ^ Aleph_0 <= Aleph_1? No, in ZF it shows aleph_0 ^ aleph_0 = c >= aleph_1 .
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: why Peano Axioms never had Frontview & Backview #291 CorrectingMath Next: Helmholtz equation and the Maximum Principle |