From: Robert Haas on
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> wrote:
> We've got two locations and some individuals signed up for a test-fest
> this weekend.  Would it be possible to do an alpha release this week?
> It would really help to be testing later code than Alpha4.

I'm willing to do the CVS bits, if that's helpful. Or maybe Peter
wants to do it. Anyway I have no problem with the idea.

....Robert

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner on
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> We've got two locations and some individuals signed up for a test-fest
>> this weekend. Would it be possible to do an alpha release this week?
>> It would really help to be testing later code than Alpha4.
>
> I'm willing to do the CVS bits, if that's helpful. Or maybe Peter
> wants to do it. Anyway I have no problem with the idea.

or just use a specific recent snapshot and let people test that just in
case it is not feasible doing a new alpha on short notice.


Stefan

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Josh Berkus on

> or just use a specific recent snapshot and let people test that just in
> case it is not feasible doing a new alpha on short notice.

Doesn't work if we want to test it on windows. And snaphsots have more
compile dependancies than releases do.

Also ... this isn't short notice. I requested a new alpha, this week, 2
weeks ago.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Robert Haas on
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
>> or just use a specific recent snapshot and let people test that just in
>> case it is not feasible doing a new alpha on short notice.
>
> Doesn't work if we want to test it on windows.  And snaphsots have more
> compile dependancies than releases do.
>
> Also ... this isn't short notice.  I requested a new alpha, this week, 2
> weeks ago.

Also, I already said I would do it (unless another committer wants
to). Somebody just has to tell me what they want done and when.
Presumably that means providing a patch to the release notes for me to
check in, a date to make the branch, and where they want the tarball
put.

....Robert

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner on
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>> or just use a specific recent snapshot and let people test that just in
>>> case it is not feasible doing a new alpha on short notice.
>> Doesn't work if we want to test it on windows. And snaphsots have more
>> compile dependancies than releases do.
>>
>> Also ... this isn't short notice. I requested a new alpha, this week, 2
>> weeks ago.
>
> Also, I already said I would do it (unless another committer wants
> to). Somebody just has to tell me what they want done and when.
> Presumably that means providing a patch to the release notes for me to
> check in, a date to make the branch, and where they want the tarball
> put.

yeah but you also need people changing the website - and probably more
important given that josh wants windows as well help from dave for doing
a new windows installer :)


Stefan

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: [HACKERS] five-key syscaches
Next: [HACKERS] GSoC Query