Prev: Why Are Card Readers Intermittent?
Next: ASMP and ACLU gathering data on police harassment ofphotographers
From: RichA on 12 Feb 2010 13:32
The micro 4/3rds cameras are NOT high ISO machines, PERIOD. If you
shoot at 100-200 ISO, then they are capable of some exceptionally good
images, but beyond that there is noise and other problems. Witness
the one in this post. It's at 3200 ISO, but it is reduced to less
than 1/4 of it's original size and it shows noise, excessive noise
removal, low resolution (even in areas not effected by movement)
yellow blotching and ugly vertical banding on the left side. ANY
modern APS or especially FF camera will do much better so use the
cameras matched for specific tasks. However, the vertical banding is
confined to the GH1 which uses a different sensor than the other micro
4/3rds cameras.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=34517974
From: John Navas on 12 Feb 2010 14:49
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:32:42 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
wrote in
<4640d9ec-f716-4aa0-8a7c-2dd72642d7e6(a)m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>:

>[SNIP]

Troll alert!

--
Best regards,
John

Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer,
it makes you a dSLR owner.
"The single most important component of a camera
is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: Ray Fischer on 12 Feb 2010 22:39
RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>The micro 4/3rds cameras are NOT high ISO machines, PERIOD.

Rich hates everything

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: R. Mark Clayton on 14 Feb 2010 14:14
Ever tried high ISO film - very grainy (= noise, can't be enlarged much
etc.)

"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4640d9ec-f716-4aa0-8a7c-2dd72642d7e6(a)m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> The micro 4/3rds cameras are NOT high ISO machines, PERIOD. If you
> shoot at 100-200 ISO, then they are capable of some exceptionally good
> images, but beyond that there is noise and other problems. Witness
> the one in this post. It's at 3200 ISO, but it is reduced to less
> than 1/4 of it's original size and it shows noise, excessive noise
> removal, low resolution (even in areas not effected by movement)
> yellow blotching and ugly vertical banding on the left side. ANY
> modern APS or especially FF camera will do much better so use the
> cameras matched for specific tasks. However, the vertical banding is
> confined to the GH1 which uses a different sensor than the other micro
> 4/3rds cameras.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=34517974


From: Robert Coe on 19 Feb 2010 18:55
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:32:42 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
: The micro 4/3rds cameras are NOT high ISO machines, PERIOD. If you
: shoot at 100-200 ISO, then they are capable of some exceptionally good
: images, but beyond that there is noise and other problems. Witness
: the one in this post. It's at 3200 ISO, but it is reduced to less
: than 1/4 of it's original size and it shows noise, excessive noise
: removal, low resolution (even in areas not effected by movement)
: yellow blotching and ugly vertical banding on the left side. ANY
: modern APS or especially FF camera will do much better so use the
: cameras matched for specific tasks. However, the vertical banding is
: confined to the GH1 which uses a different sensor than the other micro
: 4/3rds cameras.
:
: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=34517974

Ng pczaaso, Rich, g vstlzhniiynye kt� dszlfktarnye. Bz ftl nz Nikon g Canon
garkkilarczne, a ftellj. Ba kt� dj saal, kach fstlmnkdrrl, pzh fnn pa garngni
hhaktr z.

Arcztl
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Why Are Card Readers Intermittent?
Next: ASMP and ACLU gathering data on police harassment ofphotographers