An electron changes a quark
in [Physics]
|
Prev: [DUMBS]: My Personal Observations and Viewpoints About a Variety of Subjects !
Next: Does God need to prove He exists?
From: PD on 5 May 2008 15:08 On May 2, 7:33 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote: > On May 2, 1:16 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 2, 2:54 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > On May 2, 5:42 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 1, 3:11 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On May 1, 8:59 am, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 24, 12:24 am, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 20, 1:26 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be > > > > > > > > > forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced > > > > > > > > > together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons > > > > > > > > > quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a > > > > > > > > > lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 > > > > > > > > > Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity. > > > > > > > > Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun > > > > > > > > (perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this > > > > > > > > without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away. > > > > > > > > It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of > > > > > > > > years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen > > > > > > > > without being any oxymoron. > > > > > > > > > PD > > > > > > > > The only answer is that atomic shells hold electrons and protons at > > > > > > > bay. Otherwise their attraction would bring them together. But what > > > > > > > are shells made of? > > > > > > > Atomic shells hold Halley's comet at bay from the sun? > > > > > > > > Demicritus said atoms are little hard things. > > > > > > Non sequiter > > > > > You probably mean "non sequitur". > > > > > But actually, it DOES follow. > > > > > You apparently would *like* to say that the only thing that keeps > > > > electrons from falling into protons is material atomic shells. > > > > > But the question you haven't asked yourself yet is why anything is > > > > needed at all. And as another example of a case where nothing is > > > > needed at all, I mentioned Halley's comet, which is gravitationally > > > > *attracted* to the Sun (not repelled) and yet both approaches and > > > > recedes from the Sun every seven decades, without needing anything to > > > > keep it from falling in. > > > > > So when you understand how something can behave that way, even though > > > > it is under the influence of a purely attractive force, and without > > > > anything holding it out, then you might -- just might -- see that the > > > > material atomic shells you imagine are necessary in the atom are not > > > > necessary at all. > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > An electron transmutes a quark. > > > No, it doesn't. A W boson does. > > > > How can a lepton transmute a baryon? > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Combining an electron with a proton into a neutron requires force. But > they are supposed to be electrically attractive. A neutron weighs more than a proton plus an electron. So being electrically attracted doesn't solve that problem. > > Non sequitur.
From: Autymn D. C. on 7 May 2008 09:04
On May 6, 12:07 pm, Enes <pies_na_teo...(a)gazeta.pl> wrote: > > You familiar with the elèctròn's elèctronic dipole moment? > > I don,t know what do you realy want. > Please ask me again (without familiar ;), can you ? Are you aware of its measurement and how that constrains your new leptòn? > Btw: > +/- particle gives us many possibilities. For instance there was 2 > electropositron helium models. The Swedish experiment confirm only one > of them. how? |