From: Tim Wescott on
whit3rd wrote:
> On Mar 26, 9:09 am, Daku <dakup...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could some analog guru please help ? Digital circuits can use a delay
>> locked loop to generate a negative delay - is there any corresponding
>> analog circuit to achieve the same result ?
>
> Firstly, what is 'delay locked loop'?

It is a delay line with a variable tap, or some sort of variable RC
delay, that is controlled in a similar manner to a PLL to get controlled
delay.

They're way popular in FPGAs these days, to de-skew clocks, double
clocks (by XORing a clock with a delayed version), have controlled phase
differences between clocks, and other useful things that you need if you
want to build really, really, really fast logic on a chip that's only
really, really fast.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com
From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:26:24 -0700, Tim Wescott <tim(a)seemywebsite.now>
wrote:

>John Larkin wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT), Daku <dakupoto(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Could some analog guru please help ? Digital circuits can use a delay
>>> locked loop to generate a negative delay - is there any corresponding
>>> analog circuit to achieve the same result ? Any hints, suggestions
>>> would be invaluable. Thanks in advance for your help.
>>
>> What kind of signal do you want to delay? If it's a periodic clock,
>> all sorts of phase shifters or delay lines will work. A 0.75T delay
>> line looks like a -0.25T delay. Or invert phase and delay 0.25, same
>> result.
>>
>> If it's a general signal, it's impossible.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>Well, so much for the stock market investment machine I was going to build!

Even a small negative delay could be put into a feedback loop to get
arbitrary long negative delays, enough to see the Drudge Report a week
in advance.

John


From: krw on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:42:11 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 26, 9:09�am, Daku <dakup...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could some analog guru please help ? Digital circuits can use a delay
>> locked loop to generate a negative delay - is there any corresponding
>> analog circuit to achieve the same result ?
>
>Firstly, what is 'delay locked loop'?

It's a delay line in the feed back path of an oscillator. A "digital PLL", if
you will.

>When one needs a signal and a delayed copy of that signal, one uses
>a delay line (simplest is just a long cable). Then, the events
>on the signal cable are occurring prior to those on the delay line,
>and you can refer timings to the delay-line-output and
>call the direct signal 'negative delay'. That's how an
>oscilloscope can trigger on a pulse and still show the
>lead-up to the pulse on the display.
From: Daku on
The problem I am trying to solve is :
Consider an analog PLL and the reference signal is pure sinusoidal. In
a "locked in" mode, the VCO output will be a sinusoidal signal of
exactly same frequency as the reference signal, but has an added phase
(basically delay),
because of the way the VCO works. So is there a way to remove this
phase ??


On Mar 26, 9:20 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

> What kind of signal do you want to delay? If it's a periodic clock,
> all sorts of phase shifters or delay lines will work. A 0.75T delay
> line looks like a -0.25T delay. Or invert phase and delay 0.25, same
> result.
>
> If it's a general signal, it's impossible.
>
> John

From: Tim Wescott on
Daku wrote:

>
> On Mar 26, 9:20 pm, John Larkin
> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>> What kind of signal do you want to delay? If it's a periodic clock,
>> all sorts of phase shifters or delay lines will work. A 0.75T delay
>> line looks like a -0.25T delay. Or invert phase and delay 0.25, same
>> result.
>>
>> If it's a general signal, it's impossible.
>>
>> John
>
> The problem I am trying to solve is :
> Consider an analog PLL and the reference signal is pure sinusoidal. In
> a "locked in" mode, the VCO output will be a sinusoidal signal of
> exactly same frequency as the reference signal, but has an added phase
> (basically delay),
> because of the way the VCO works. So is there a way to remove this
> phase ??
>

That depends on your phase detector. If you're talking about a classic
mixer-style phase detector that returns zero error when the VCO is 90
degrees off from the reference -- yes.

So you can solve that, either by making a network that phase shifts the
VCO by 90 degrees before applying it to the phase detector, or -- if
your reference is also a pure tone -- by using a digital reference
detector that returns zero error when the phases match.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com