From: Edward Green on 24 May 2010 21:22 How would one go about operationally defining radial and circumferential distances in the vicinity of a black hole? Does it mean something to be "1 cm above the horizon"?
From: BURT on 24 May 2010 21:32 On May 24, 6:22 pm, Edward Green <spamspamsp...(a)netzero.com> wrote: > How would one go about operationally defining radial and > circumferential distances in the vicinity of a black hole? Does it > mean something to be "1 cm above the horizon"? Event horizons violate motion laws of matter and energy laws of light. Mitch Raemsch
From: eric gisse on 24 May 2010 23:38 Edward Green wrote: > How would one go about operationally defining radial and > circumferential distances in the vicinity of a black hole? With calculus. How would you calculate the surface area of a sphere? Same method. > Does it > mean something to be "1 cm above the horizon"? Sure.
From: Edward Green on 25 May 2010 04:41 On May 24, 11:38 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Edward Green wrote: > > How would one go about operationally defining radial and > > circumferential distances in the vicinity of a black hole? > > With calculus. How would you calculate the surface area of a sphere? Same > method. > > > Does it > > mean something to be "1 cm above the horizon"? > > Sure. I was looking for a prescription with meter sticks.
From: Don Stockbauer on 25 May 2010 07:22 And now a question... How much mold could a slime mold mold if a slime mold could mold slime?
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Light is the unified form of the universe Next: Falling into slower time |