From: MathFreak NoMore on
hanson in <news:by3hh.375$HT5.265(a)trnddc02> wrote:

> PS: I do not understand why you seem to have objections
> for me to use your name. After all you posted for years
> under that handle,

Perhaps this poses a challange for your Ravencrag staff
but for me It's just common sense.

If you've seen sense in not using your real name here
then you cannot insist on using another person's real
name when he, for whatever reason, prefers an alias.

But if you do this because I kick some of you
Americans' ruder asses, that's another story. I put my
name under every one of those statements anytime you
want. So can you.

--

"ze bimAri batar bimAr-dAri"
From: MathFreak NoMore on
"hanson" <hanson(a)quick.net> wrote in
news:svihh.4134$od6.1223(a)trnddc04:

> [Mehram]
>> That's a dishonest distortion of what he said. The actual
>> words are at:
>>
> [hanson]
> Yes, it is a mild, santized, shorter version as it contains
> only the kinder, nicer and pertinent sentences distilled
> OUT of the lengthy diatribe you refer to below which
> actually puts the Zionist cause even into a far worse light
> then does the abridged edition above.
>

No none of that. You must read him carefully. He's just saying
he's had it. While the pieces you had selected just misses the
point while quoting him verbatim. That's why I said it was
dishonest. You do that sometimes.

He's a soldier, a simpleton. And nobody wants a soldier
suddenly placed at positions of political decision. Hence what
I said earlier. And he knows how far he can go.

Israel almost got nuked in 1982. He would _kiss_ the hands of
those Hezbollah fighters whom we trained to settle the matters
differently. He knows that one too. But he's just a soldier
and that's how a soldier must manage.

In some similar ways Iranians have had it too. I can
understand his blight.

--
"sad musho ye gorbeh kAfiyeh."
From: MathFreak NoMore on
"hanson" <hanson(a)quick.net> wrote in news:81mhh.876$4Q6.221
@trnddc06:

> Don't disappoint me now.

I'm afraid I have to :) I don't think you have the capability to
handle anything political in nature. Stick to your anecdotes and
things logistical. That is, your best posts are the ones that
provide raw data. Don't analyze them :)

--
"inhameh khar hasto mA piyAdeh rAh mirim."
From: hanson on
Mehram Maleki "MathFreak NoMore" <MathFreakNoMore(a)FakeAddress.com>
w/i news:Xns989FE943D88EAMathFreakNoMoreFakeA(a)216.168.3.66...
>
[hanson]
> "hanson" <hanson(a)quick.net> w/i news:81mhh.876$4Q6.221(a)trnddc06:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f769dd6d47260b33
>> Don't disappoint me now, Mehram.
>
[Mehram]
> I'm afraid I have to :) I don't think you have the capability to
> handle anything political in nature. Stick to your anecdotes and
> things logistical. That is, your best posts are the ones that
> provide raw data. Don't analyze them :)
>
[hanson]
Aye thank you, Mehram, like these ones here,
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f769dd6d47260b33
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/65a0eb47a52ace67
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3858fbe0205e9ce8
..... drum roll....... here come Mehram, with raw data:
>
[Mehram]
"Stupidity isn't always bad for you. It is only sometimes bad for you."
> - Maleki
>
[hanson]
ahahahah... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha...
If there is a corollary in the Koran to the Bible's verse of ~
"Blessed are the idiots and the mentally feeble for they
shall enter/inherit the lord's heavenly kingdom"... then
Mehram, then I do understand why you are so deeply
religious.... maharaja... THANKS FOR THE LAUGHS!
ROTFLMAO....ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
[Mehram]
> "inhameh khar hasto mA piyAdeh rAh mirim."
>
[hanson]
oh yeah?!...: "Y kazuntz dil Angadina hih �n dih ha moss mys kuhr"


From: Sorcerer on

"hanson" <hanson(a)quick.net> wrote in message news:vTCih.1994$Eo.1933(a)trnddc08...
| Mehram Maleki "MathFreak NoMore" <MathFreakNoMore(a)FakeAddress.com>
| w/i news:Xns989FE943D88EAMathFreakNoMoreFakeA(a)216.168.3.66...
| >
| [hanson]
| > "hanson" <hanson(a)quick.net> w/i news:81mhh.876$4Q6.221(a)trnddc06:
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f769dd6d47260b33
| >> Don't disappoint me now, Mehram.
| >
| [Mehram]
| > I'm afraid I have to :) I don't think

That says it all. No need to go further, many contributors confess
to not thinking.