Prev: Is the (argument from inconsistent revelations) a real logical fallacy?
Next: Interlinear Bible
From: Androcles on 16 May 2010 10:14

"harald" <hvan(a)swissonline.ch> wrote in message
news:8fe0bfd0-37fe-463e-8864-8de1bddb22ae(a)o1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
> >> It will take a ray
> > > t1 = AB/(c - v) seconds
> > > for the outbound leg in that direction and
> > > t2 = AB/(c + v)
> > > for the return leg. In the perpendicular legs the relative velocity
> > > of light is q, so it will take t = AB/q seconds each way.
>
> That too.
> However, Androcles might have written the next little bit,
> if he tried to reconstruct Einstein's initial paper (P1); rather than
> to rant and rave against E as he now does.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
-- George Orwell's 'Animal Farm'.

t = AB/(c-v)
t = AB/(c+v)

"All t's are equal, but some t's are more equal than others."
The real Androcles, reconstructing 'girdle' as a pig.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZldlyeR8DU







From: glird on 21 May 2010 14:47
On May 16, 10:14 am, "Androcles" <Headless...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z>
wrote:
>
> t = AB/(c-v)
> t = AB/(c+v)
>
> "All t's are equal, but some t's are more equal than others."
> The real Androcles

As usual, the "real" Androcles ignores the fact that in EINSTEIN'S
equations, where t was the time as measured by system K, those two
times were NOT equal.
Otoh, the times t' (tee PRIME), which are a function of t and dt'/dx,
ARE equal as measured by Johny Android's differently moving system
Kappa (x',y',z'; t').

But so what?! Neither he nor anyone on these newsgroups seems
interested in
learning what E's equations actually mean.

glird
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Is the (argument from inconsistent revelations) a real logical fallacy?
Next: Interlinear Bible