Prev: combinations of additive and multiplicative creation: Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #181; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: topology
From: H. Shinya on 23 Jun 2010 02:06
> I'd appreciate having the name of the Chapter in Titchmarsh [1951]
> and/or Section number and mathematicians who discovered this
> estimate.

The name of the Chapter is

The General Distribution of the Zeros

The section is 9.6.

Mathematicians who discovered this estimate, I do not konw.
Probably one of the guys who discovered the first
analytic proof of the Prime Number Theorem?



From: H. Shinya on 24 Jun 2010 08:46
On Jun 23, 3:06 pm, "H. Shinya" <shinya...(a)yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> > I'd appreciate having the name of the Chapter in Titchmarsh [1951]
> > and/or Section number and mathematicians who discovered this
> > estimate.
>
> The name of the Chapter is
>
> The General Distribution of the Zeros
>
> The section is 9.6.
>
> Mathematicians who discovered this estimate, I do not konw.
> Probably one of the guys who discovered the first
> analytic proof of the Prime Number Theorem?


I will keep quiet by this post, in which
I want to inform you of some minor mistakes
in the paper.

The parts which I have not considered carefully
are equation (21) of pp. 7 and equation (34)
of pp. 11. (Both mistakes are exactly of the
same type.)

Beneath the first summation symbol of (21),
add another condition

L = 1 iff M^2 = 1, M^{2} > 1;

beneath the second one of (21), add

M > 1.

Without these additional conditions,
we would have summed up extra terms
in the right side of (21), such as
"n = 1"-term and squarefree terms.

These changes only bring out a few new terms,
all of which are analytic in some neighborhood of
the segment [1/2, oo) in subsequent relations,
and so not fatal to my arguments.



From: Victor Eijkhout on 24 Jun 2010 11:28
H. Shinya <shinyah21(a)yahoo.co.jp> wrote:

> What are you.

And if so, why?

Victor.
--
Victor Eijkhout -- eijkhout at tacc utexas edu
From: H. Shinya on 24 Jun 2010 22:57
On Jun 25, 12:28 am, s...(a)sig.for.address (Victor Eijkhout) wrote:
> H. Shinya <shinya...(a)yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> > What are you.
>
> And if so, why?
>
> Victor.
> --
> Victor Eijkhout -- eijkhout at tacc utexas edu

No, Sir.

The purpose of the question was to ask the guy in a rude way in
response to some dirty words.








First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: combinations of additive and multiplicative creation: Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #181; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: topology