Prev: Loony problems
Next: 7 proves he can't do simple math (was: Another Micoshfat centric myth dies: 75% of Linux developers are now paid)
From: spike1 on 22 Feb 2010 09:30 And so it was that in the sacred domain of uk.comp.os.linux, 7 <website_has_email(a)www.enemygadgets.com> uttered the following pearls of wisdom: > David Cowie wrote: > >> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:49:51 +0000, 7 wrote: >> >>> Another Micoshfat centric myth dies: 75% of Linux developers are now >>> paid >> >> I refuse to take you seriously if you cannot spell Micro$oft correctly. > > > why? > > Because only idiots do that CONSTANTLY. The odd joke here and there, fine... But only utter imbeciles such as yourself are incapable of spelling things properly. -- | |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack| | spike1(a)freenet.co.uk |in the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you| | |can't move, with no hope of rescue. | | Andrew Halliwell BSc |Consider how lucky you are that life has been | | in |good to you so far... | | Computer Science | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy.|
From: 7 on 22 Feb 2010 17:34 spike1(a)freenet.co.uk wrote: > And so it was that in the sacred domain of uk.comp.os.linux, 7 > <website_has_email(a)www.enemygadgets.com> uttered the following pearls of > wisdom: >> David Cowie wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:49:51 +0000, 7 wrote: >>> >>>> Another Micoshfat centric myth dies: 75% of Linux developers are now >>>> paid >>> >>> I refuse to take you seriously if you cannot spell Micro$oft correctly. >> >> >> why? >> >> > Because only idiots do that CONSTANTLY. The odd joke here and there, > fine... But only utter imbeciles such as yourself are incapable of > spelling things properly. So?
From: Rex Ballard on 22 Feb 2010 18:13
On Jan 21, 4:49 pm, 7 <website_has_em...(a)www.enemygadgets.com> wrote: > Another Micoshfat centric myth dies: 75% of Linux developers are now paid > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wherever you turn, Linux is now a highly paid profession with support > and paid up engineers. > http://apcmag.com/linux-now-75-corporate.htm > Linux has turned from hobby to strict businesses reliant on it > like all the stock exchanges around the world and military. Yes, major contributors include employees of: IBM Red Hat Sun Microsystems Oracle AMD/ATI NVidia Hewlett Packard Dell numerous others... Many of these contributors have gone through a process where their employers screened the contribution, making sure that the code was original (not taken from a client or vendor) and they are paid for continuing to support and enhance these contributions. Many of the "Other" employees are consultants and administrators who have contributed code, but their employers do not want to "sponsor" the contributor specifically for their contribution to avoid any primary or secondary liability, such as damages caused by a bug introduced by the contributor or the contribution. Many companies also contribute funds, equipment, and technical information. Many of these contributor companies would rather deal with the product of a hotly competitive market where the common framework only generates revenue based on actual SUPPORT of the products in question. Distributors who provide excellent support of a "Stable Version" as well as encouraging and staying current with "emerging" versions tend to be the most profitable, most notably Red Hat, Novell, and Concentric. Many companies have also found that Linux provides value to their own products, for example, Oracle, IBM, Sybase, and Sun have all developed products for Linux, often adding modules, shared libraries, and other utilities that allow customers to get better performance from Linux than from other operating systems available for that platform. Many companies, such as DLink, Link-Sys/Cisco, Nortel, and Sony have produced appliances based on embedded Linux kernel with modules and plug-ins designed to produce highly functional and inexpensive devices - many of which plug into the PC's USB, Ethernet, WiFi, and Video interfaces. It may even be safe to say that most "Windows Systems" now depend on "Linux Appliances" and Linux "enhancements". Linux has also produced a whole group of software applications that have enhanced the usability of Windows, even if not always as much as they have enhanced the usability of Linux. |