Another response....Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but EinsteinDingleberries still worship him
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: For PD....was; Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but EinsteinDingleberries still worship him
Next: For PD....was; Re: Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
From: Me, ...again! on 2 Jun 2010 07:26 I got a kick out of this response, too. See at the very end, too. /////////////////////////////// On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, J.H.Boersema wrote: > On 2010-06-01, hanson <hanson(a)quick.net> wrote: >> "Einstein was right?" yields 148,000 Google hits, posted by >> disciples of Einstein's cult, known as Einstein Dingleberries. >>> >> When googling for "Einstein was wrong, stupid, a plagiarist, fraud, >> liar, thief, nitwit, fool & idiot" in 9 individual Google searches with >> the above attributes (all of which appeared in sci.physics) then the >> accumultated sum shows 5'165'800 Google hits... ahahahAHAHA > > lol, great > >> One can argue about this anyway one wishes, but the hand writing >> is on the wall. --- Einstein's con has run its course. His 15 minutes >> are up... ... "You can fool all the people some of the time, and >> some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people >> all the time. -- by Abraham Lincoln. >>> >> Albert's Dingleberries will moan, groan & howl over this... ahahaha >> Details of this trend is shown below in Arthur's post who wrote: >>> >> "Me, ...again!" <arthures(a)mv.com> wrote in message >> news:Pine.BSF.4.61.1005250817140.61930(a)osmium.mv.net... >> >> Was Einstein right or wrong? >> >> What we have are two schools of thought: >> i) Einstein did something, vs. >> ii) a bunch of experts/skeptics who think Einstein made a lot of noise, >> more heat than light, and fooled a lot of people. >> >> Here, below, are many more books which cast much doubt on >> Einstein's "contributions"...... >> >> (all dug up by searches on Amazon.com under: au=einstein) >> >> Note that most of these books were written in the last decade or two. If >> we do a search going back to the beginnings of SR, GR, then I'm sure >> there will be found many many dozens of books written by equally smart >> people who challenge and/or do not accept Einstein. >> >> I think it would be foolish to think the story is over, final, and >> finished. >> >> //////////////////////////////////////// >> >> Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius [Paperback] >> Hans C. Ohanian (Author) >> >> ================================ >> >> Einstein's Greatest Mistake: Abandonment of the Aether >> by Sid Deutsch >> >> ================================================== >> >> Questioning Einstein: Is Relativity Necessary? >> by, Tom Bethell >> >> Review.... >> That a book by a great and established writer like Tom Bethell, >> who is a long-time science writer and political columnist at The >> American Spectator, hasn't been officially reviewed yet, says >> more about those who pose as the intellectual and editorial >> guardians of literature than it does about the quality of this >> book or the stature of its author. In fact, it is an engaging, >> well researched book about one of the most interesting paradigm >> struggles of the twentieth century (and still ongoing today). >> That Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (SR) was influenced >> by and made quickly popular by the relativistic ideologies of >> its time (1905) seems to this writer a foregone conclusion. >> But it was the Michelson-Morley experiment that failed to >> detect a "luminiferous ether," which gave SR scientific credibility. >> But Michelson himself soon doubted its conclusions and proved it in >> the later Michelson-Gale experiment which did detect an ether. >> >> H. Lorentz, a contemporary of Einstein, and a scientist of equal >> stature, argued in numerous debates with Einstein that all >> "relativistic effects" (such as the bending of starlight as it >> passes near the sun) were the result of light traveling through >> an "entrained ether" which surrounds and moves with planetary >> bodies--otherwise known as the gravitational field. Other >> well-known physicists of the day also doubted the veracity of >> SR, especially its principle of space-time distortion. A few >> were: Herbert Dingle, whose "paradox" asked the question of >> which "clock" would run slow (and thus experience time dilation >> predicted by SR) of two relativistic travelers; as for example two >> rocket ships in different inertial frames (i.e., going at different >> speeds relative to each other). Another physicist, H. Ives, of the >> famous Ives-Stillwell experiment to test the Doppler effect of >> fast moving mesons, became a lifelong enemy of Einstein because >> he felt that his results were being misinterpreted. And there were >> many others who disagreed with Einstein's fundamental conclusions. >> >> Even Einstein himself, as Bethell points out, later in life admitted >> that forces propagating through empty space without a medium in >> which they could be conveyed, was a logical absurdity--a fact never >> mentioned in textbooks, or in other "easy Einstein" books. In the >> later part of the twentieth century, other scientific critics picked >> up where Lorentz and his contemporaries had left off. Among them were >> Tom Van Flandern, Carver Mead, and Petr Beckmann. Bethell concentrates >> on Beckmann's critique, written in a technical book called Einstein >> Plus Two, in which the author claims that all the effects of both >> Special and General Relativity can be explained using classical >> physics. Bethell brings Beckmann's book down to earth from the arcane >> heights of Mt. Olympus by rendering Beckmann's mathematical descriptions >> understandable to the layman. >> >> If you are interested in the history of one of the most pivotal scientific >> ideas of our time, if you have always believed that the world should >> make sense but would still like to know about the mysteries of relativity, >> this book may be for you. And this reviewer might add that although >> Bethell might not know it yet, this may be his most significant book. >> ===================================================== >> >> Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity >> Theories by Al Kelly >> >> review... >> Al Kelly is right, July 3, 2009 By Alvin D. Heindel "another patent >> examiner" (USA) - See all my reviews >> >> >> This review is from: Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's >> Relativity Theories (Paperback) >> Al Kelly should be commended for his courage in standing up to the >> Einsteinian science mafia. The twin paradox proves Einsteinian relativity >> is impossible. Einstein's theories should be called absolutivity which is >> another logical contradiction. It was created when scientists believed in >> the steady state theory of the universe. Now that scientists accept Hubble's >> big bang theory and the fact that the earth's velocity has been measured >> relative to the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the >> big bang, it shows you can measure an absolute velocity based on Einstein's >> theories. Also, scientists believe there's nothing outside the event horizon >> around our universe. This provides us with another means for measuring a >> velocity relative to a point in space which is an absolute velocity based >> on Einstein's theories. Obviously, space and aether are infinite and gravity >> is an aether density gradient, not curved space. Kelly doesn't mention >> G. BURNISTON BROWN's discussion of the twin paradox in the Bulletin of >> the Institute of Physics and Physical Society, Vol. 18 (March, 1967) pp. >> 71--77, easily found on the internet. He provides another good >> anti-Einstein argument based on the twin paradox. I tend to think H. A. >> Lorentz's theory might be the best one. Also, Einstein insisted relativity >> depends on the existence of the aether which is denied by the physics >> establishment. SRT depends on the existence of the aether, the same way >> Newtonian relativity depends on the existence of space. In Lorentz's >> theory, the aether is NOT at absolute rest. A. J. Kox gives a translation >> of one paragraph from one of Lorentz's articles: 37 It should be emphasized >> that LORENTZ did not adhere to the idea of absolute space. In LORENTZ (1895) >> (sect. 2), for instance, he states that it is meaningless to talk about >> absolute rest of the ether and that the expression 'the ether is at rest' >> only means that the different parts of the ether do not move with respect to >> each other (AHESc-1988 pages 67-78). >> This is given as a reference: >> 1895 Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in >> bewegten Körpern (Leiden: Brill, 1895); repr. in CP, Vol. 5, pp. 1-138. >> The 1906 reprint can be downloaded from Google books. >> >> ======================================================== >> >> Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist by Christopher Jon >> Bjerknes (Paperback - July 2002) >> >> ====================================== >> >> Einstein's Riddle: Riddles, Paradoxes, and Conundrums to Stretch >> Your Mind by Jeremy Stangroom (Hardcover - Apr. 28, 2009) >> >> ================================================= >> >> Reinventing Gravity: A Physicist Goes Beyond Einstein >> by John W. Moffat (Hardcover - Sept. 30, 2008) >> >> ==================================== >> >> What Einstein Did Not See: Redefining Time to Understand >> Space by Thomas W. Sills (Paperback - June 1, 2009) >> >> ============================================= >> >> Einstein's Greatest Blunder?: The Cosmological Constant and >> Other Fudge Factors in the Physics of the Universe >> (Questions of Science) by Donald Goldsmith (Paperback - Oct. 15, 1997) >> >> ============================================= >> >> Dialog About Objections Against the Theory of Relativity >> by Albert Einstein (Paperback - Nov. 12, 2009) >> >> ============================================================ >> >> The Quantum Theory of Planck, Einstein, Bohr and >> Sommerfeld: Its Foundation and the Rise of Its Difficulties >> 1900-1925 1 (The Historical Development of ... and the >> Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925) >> by Jagdish Mehra and H. Rechenberg (Paperback - Dec. 28, 2000) >> >> ====================================== >> >> The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers: A Counter-Revolution in >> Physics by Dean Turner; Richard Hazelett (Paperback - Oct. 1, 2005) >> >> ========================================================== >> >> Einstein on Trial or Metaphysical Principles of Natural >> Philosophy by Jorge Cespedes-Cure (Paperback - July 1, 2002) >> >> ======================================================= >> >> Einstein as Myth and Muse by Alan J. Friedman and >> Carol C. Donley (Paperback - Apr. 28, 1989) >> >> ======================================== >> >> Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory >> Of Relativity (Paperback) >> ~ Kamen George Kamenov (Author), Kamen G. Kamenov (Illustrator >> >> 1 of 2 people found the following review helpful: >> A classic book.!!!, December 4, 2008 By Peter Stone (USA) - See all >> my reviews >> >> This review is from: Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of >> Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) >> In 1972 the famous British professor Herbert Dingle, >> an ex-relativist who turned into antirelativist, published >> a book against relativity titled: Science at the crossroads. >> Because of that he was gradually removed from the "scientiffic" >> establishment. Kamen Kamenov's book is one of the books, alongside >> those of Herbert Dingle, Harald Nordenson and Henri Bergson, >> highly recommendable to those who really want to understand how >> incurably flawed and useless the "theory" in question is and >> why it should be abandoned in its entirety. Some books are hard >> to find. Look in "bookfinder.com" and read about the above >> mentionned autors in Wikipedia. >> >> 7 of 12 people found the following review helpful: >> A revolutionary new book !, May 30, 2001 By >> Robert (Berkeley,California) - See all my reviews >> >> This review is from: Space, Time and Matter, and the Falsity of >> Einstein's Theory of Relativity (Paperback) >> Provocative and fascinating. Mr. Kamenov provides the clearest >> possible nonmathematical explanation of the present day understanding >> of the theory of relativity and then unmistakably disproves it. His >> logic is undeniable . I think that after reading the book nobody >> can believe in the validity of the theory of relatvity any longer >> but quite the opposite is true,the theory is wrong. Mr. Kamenov >> explains in plain langauge the real nature of relity and offers >> alternative solution to the theory of relativity. He proves >> the existence of ether. The book deals not only with theory of >> relativity but also with the philosophy of space, time and physical >> matter and explains in a plain , nonmathematical way the nature >> of electricity , magnetism and gravitation. This book is realy >> easy to understand but it requires an abstract thinking . It >> is a great exercise for the mind and Mr. Kamenov is a great mind. >> I read the book several times and every time it was even more >> interesting. I could not stop reading it. I believe that this >> book will revolutionize the modern science. It is a real treasure. >> >> ============================= >> >> Einstein, the Aether & Variable Rest Mass (Paperback) >> ~ Jack Heighway (Author) >> >> ================================= >> >> Einstein's Relativity Theory: Correct, Paradoxical, and Wrong >> by Lyubomir, T. Gruyitch (Hardcover - Dec. 6, 2006) >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ///////////////////////////////////// >> >> >> >> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net --- > > Brilliant ... looks like it will be over soon ? > Some people in China are also happy it is over, apparently. > (I came here to dump some more anti-relativity propaganda, sorry ;). > They said people who fight relativity always in the end leave. > Maybe this time they will be leaving. I wonder what the People in > general will think about this ... chances aren't small they will > think nothing of it, completely controlled by the mass media for worse > or better ? The mass media caused it, and then can remove it, and > still be in power, I guess that shows who has the real power either > way ... the money power (who generally control the mass media through > money). > > * > > (Mail send back from me to Yanshan University who send happy mass > e-mail about anti-relativity ...) > > Hello [...name withheld for privacy...], Yanshan University, > Qinhuangdao, China, > > I feel honored that you would send me an e-mail about this issue, > because I am not working at any University (I attempted to write > a dis-proof of relativity theory and an alternative qualitative > explanation for stellar abberation, > http://www.socialism.nl/~joshb/disproof.html ). > > Perhaps you are also interested to learn that there are at least > 2 more problems with "popular western" science and their ideas, > or perhaps 3: > 1. The economics of capitalism and free trade is insufficient. > 2. The theory of Darwinism, seems it might be incomplete for humans. > 3. The (western) theories about state democracy may be underdeveloped > as well. > > In fear of making advertizement for myself (without due reason): > If you are interested in these subjects - or perhaps the School of > Economics and Management at Yanshan University ? - perhaps you would > like to read about it here on my (free of course): web page > http://www.socialism.nl These things are very important I think, if > they are done properly they can make many families have a better income, > many children may have a better life, in Holland and in China. > > One of the ways in which we can defeat relativity, is if we can make > great progress in other fields. That may increase the standing of the > contra-relativity field in general. > > best regards & good luck, > jos boersema > (private citizen of Holland) > Wibenaheerd 351, 9736 PZ Groningen, Holland > http://www.socialism.nl > > > [...] wrote: > [...] >> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/31/relativity-and-relativism/ > [...] >> (http://digitalpaper.stdaily.com:81/kjrb/html/2010-03/13/content_55229.htm ) >> >> (2) 2009-10-1, National Day Press-³Ð´«ÌúÈ˾«Éñ×·Çó¿Æѧ´´ÐÂ(inherit >> and transmit Iron Man spirit, seeking scientific >> innovation)£¨http://digitalpaper.stdaily.com:81/kjrb/html/2009-10/01/content_39847.htm£©. >> Key point, ¡°Special relativity arising from a misunderstanding >> of experimental results on the constant speed of ligh¡±£¨down load >> web£¨http://scitation.aip.org/vsearch/servlet/VerityServlet?KEY=FREESR&smode=results&maxdisp=10&possible1=Zifeng+Li&possible1zone=article&fromyear=1893&frommonth=Jan&toyear=2009&tomonth=Apr&OUTLOG=NO&viewabs=PHESEM&key=DISPLAY&docID=1&page=0&chapter=0 >> ) ). The SR rejected the basic definitions of basic units in physics. >> >> Please pay attention: 1. this reports is on the National Day Press; >> B. Special Issue For Celebrating Foundation of New Chinese For 60 >> Years; C. There is your gloss on the flag of PRC; D. Recently, in >> theoretical research, ¡°Science and Technology Daily¡± only made >> reports on anti-relativity. >> >> (3) 2008-12-2, ¼á³ÖΨÎïÖ÷Òåʱ¿ÕÖÊÄܹÛ(Persist >> on materialistic views of space-time and >> mass-energy)£¨http://digitalpaper.stdaily.com:81/kjrb/html/2008-12/02/content_12181.htm£©. >> >> >> (4) 2008-9-16, ÎÒ¾ÍÒª¼á³ÖÕâ¸ö¡°Àí¡±(I insist this >> truth)£¨http://digitalpaper.stdaily.com:81/kjrb/html/2008-09/16/content_7022.htm£©. >> >> (5) 2009-11-26, ´´Á¢Õ¸ÐÂÀíÂÛ ½â´ð¹ÅÀÏÄÑÌâ (Establishing >> perfect new theories, resolving age-old problems) >> (http://digitalpaper.stdaily.com:81/kjrb/html/2009-11/26/content_45587.htm) >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> [...] >> >> Yanshan University, China > > -- > _ _ /_\ _ _ http://www.SOCIALISM.nl Free markets and democracy, > \ /v`vvv\ / but now: properly. > /_\_#_#_/_\ > \ / Day 36 of the revolution. > |