From: krw on 18 May 2010 21:39 On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:09:28 -0700, D Yuniskis <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote: >Hi Joerg, > >Joerg wrote: >>> I'll drag out a GPS and get some actual measurements, >>> if necessary. I've not done an exhaustive survey >>> of where things work/don't work. Though I have found >>> the upper left corner to be a problem area as I am >>> often passing through there when I lose signal. >>> >>> The antenna that I was *questioning* will (physically) >>> mate to a Linksys wireless router (though not intended >>> to do so, "just coincidence" -- sorry, I don't deal with >>> RF stuff so i can't tell you what sort of connectors >>> they are -- I don't think they will mate with the >>> base unit on the phone :<) >> >> Cordless phone on a Linksys router? >> >> <scratching head> > >No, I was trying to describe the type of connector on the >antenna that I am "questioning" -- without KNOWING the >proper names for the various RF plumbing! :> RP-TNC. In theory they're hard to find, but reality is a little different. >I figured most folks have seen a linksys router (with >removable antennae) so could relate to that example. > >The phone's base unit is something like a "reverse TNC" >(??) so I can't mate the antenna to the base unit >"as is". You need an RP-TNC connector, that's all. RP-TNC to N cables are easy to find, if not a bit pricey. Try a web search. Others should be available too.
From: Joel Koltner on 18 May 2010 21:50 <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message news:o3g6v55tm7o42c00bacs1puhb4qrb4dn35(a)4ax.com... > RP-TNC. In theory they're hard to find, but reality is a little different. Until the Internet, Google, and eBay became ubiquitous something around a decade ago now, I think the FCC's approach there ("use hard-to-find connectors") worked -- but it certainly won't ever again. :-)
From: Michael A. Terrell on 18 May 2010 22:50 mpm wrote: > > On May 18, 8:15 pm, mpm <mpmill...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > On May 18, 6:09 pm, D Yuniskis <not.going.to...(a)seen.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Joerg, > > > > > Joerg wrote: > > > >> I'll drag out a GPS and get some actual measurements, > > > >> if necessary. I've not done an exhaustive survey > > > >> of where things work/don't work. Though I have found > > > >> the upper left corner to be a problem area as I am > > > >> often passing through there when I lose signal. > > > > > >> The antenna that I was *questioning* will (physically) > > > >> mate to a Linksys wireless router (though not intended > > > >> to do so, "just coincidence" -- sorry, I don't deal with > > > >> RF stuff so i can't tell you what sort of connectors > > > >> they are -- I don't think they will mate with the > > > >> base unit on the phone :<) > > > > > > Cordless phone on a Linksys router? > > > > > > <scratching head> > > > > > No, I was trying to describe the type of connector on the > > > antenna that I am "questioning" -- without KNOWING the > > > proper names for the various RF plumbing! :> > > > > > I figured most folks have seen a linksys router (with > > > removable antennae) so could relate to that example. > > > > > The phone's base unit is something like a "reverse TNC" > > > (??) so I can't mate the antenna to the base unit > > > "as is".- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > You can probably get a reverse TNC from Pasternack. (?)- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Here's the link: Murray Pasternack is a well known spammer around here. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: krw on 18 May 2010 23:35 On Tue, 18 May 2010 18:50:43 -0700, "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote: ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message >news:o3g6v55tm7o42c00bacs1puhb4qrb4dn35(a)4ax.com... >> RP-TNC. In theory they're hard to find, but reality is a little different. > >Until the Internet, Google, and eBay became ubiquitous something around a >decade ago now, I think the FCC's approach there ("use hard-to-find >connectors") worked -- but it certainly won't ever again. :-) Prezactly. These widgets are needed by the guys designing this stuff. They exist and even the FCC can't re-can them.
From: mpm on 19 May 2010 08:52
On May 18, 9:50 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > mpm wrote: > > > On May 18, 8:15 pm, mpm <mpmill...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On May 18, 6:09 pm, D Yuniskis <not.going.to...(a)seen.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Joerg, > > > > > Joerg wrote: > > > > >> I'll drag out a GPS and get some actual measurements, > > > > >> if necessary. I've not done an exhaustive survey > > > > >> of where things work/don't work. Though I have found > > > > >> the upper left corner to be a problem area as I am > > > > >> often passing through there when I lose signal. > > > > > >> The antenna that I was *questioning* will (physically) > > > > >> mate to a Linksys wireless router (though not intended > > > > >> to do so, "just coincidence" -- sorry, I don't deal with > > > > >> RF stuff so i can't tell you what sort of connectors > > > > >> they are -- I don't think they will mate with the > > > > >> base unit on the phone :<) > > > > > > Cordless phone on a Linksys router? > > > > > > <scratching head> > > > > > No, I was trying to describe the type of connector on the > > > > antenna that I am "questioning" -- without KNOWING the > > > > proper names for the various RF plumbing! :> > > > > > I figured most folks have seen a linksys router (with > > > > removable antennae) so could relate to that example. > > > > > The phone's base unit is something like a "reverse TNC" > > > > (??) so I can't mate the antenna to the base unit > > > > "as is".- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > You can probably get a reverse TNC from Pasternack. (?)- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Here's the link: > > Murray Pasternack is a well known spammer around here. > > -- > Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to > have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Of www.pasternack.com fame? I'm surprised.!! |