Anti-Einsteiniana: Natural Philosophy Alliance?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Exactly why the theories of relativity are complete nonsense - the basic mistake exposed!
Next: Ooh! Ooh! I know the main ingrediend of "dark matter"--it's "Planck matter"! (Re: Would proton decay allow for black holes?)
From: Dirk Van de moortel on 7 Jan 2010 14:40 PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote in message 3dc9baf5-9166-4d2e-9560-ab762f5d1207(a)e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com > On Jan 6, 12:42 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: [snip >> The following illustration of the glorious paradoxicalness of Divine >> Albert's Divine Special Relativity involves REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM >> leading from Einstein's 1905 false light postulate to the genuine >> absurdity defined above: >> >> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/Relativ/bugrivet.html >> "The bug-rivet paradox is a variation on the twin paradox and is >> similar to the pole-barn paradox.....The end of the rivet hits the >> bottom of the hole before the head of the rivet hits the wall. So it >> looks like the bug is squashed.....All this is nonsense from the bug's >> point of view. The rivet head hits the wall when the rivet end is just >> 0.35 cm down in the hole! The rivet doesn't get close to the >> bug....The paradox is not resolved." > > And this explanation on this website is wrong. I wrote the author ( RodNave(a)gsu.edu ) a friendly e-mail about this in October 2009. I never got a reply, so I have just sent a reminder. Dirk Vdm
From: Sam Wormley on 21 Jan 2010 10:46 On 1/21/10 5:08 AM, Pentcho Valev wrote: > Nowadays both anti-relativists and (clever) relativists know that > Einstein's special relativity is false... Hey Pentcho, I remind you that there has never been on observation that has contradicted a prediction of special relativity. Never!
From: Dirk Van de moortel on 21 Jan 2010 14:14 Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote in message h_CdnZ2pNcMl68XWnZ2dnUVZ_jJi4p2d(a)mchsi.com > On 1/21/10 5:08 AM, Pentcho Valev wrote: >> Nowadays both anti-relativists and (clever) relativists know that >> Einstein's special relativity is false... > > Hey Pentcho, I remind you that there has never been an observation > that has contradicted a prediction of special relativity. Never! Threre *has* been one such observation. It is called Pencho Valev. It contradicts every prediction of special relativity. Always! Dirk Vdm
From: Sam Wormley on 22 Jan 2010 00:09
On 1/21/10 8:25 PM, Tom Potter wrote: > > "Sam Wormley" <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:h_CdnZ2pNcMl68XWnZ2dnUVZ_jJi4p2d(a)mchsi.com... >> On 1/21/10 5:08 AM, Pentcho Valev wrote: >>> Nowadays both anti-relativists and (clever) relativists know that >>> Einstein's special relativity is false... >> >> Hey Pentcho, I remind you that there has never been on observation >> that has contradicted a prediction of special relativity. Never! > > My pal Sammy raises a good point! > Thank you, Potter! |