Prev: %%% top 10 Lovely place for Lovers %%%%
Next: anybody ever had a problem with download.com or avg?
From: Jon Danniken on 17 Feb 2010 08:27
John Doe wrote:
> Apparently, the Antec Truepower New uses Japanese capacitors. Is
> the Truepower New worth the money compared to the EarthWatts? What
> are the (typically) good quality brands?
>
> Thanks.

There's a 650W Thermaltake on sale at Newegg for $85 ($70 after rebate)
right now.

Jon


From: Flasherly on 17 Feb 2010 18:28
On Feb 16, 8:07 pm, John Doe <j...(a)usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> Apparently, the Antec Truepower New uses Japanese capacitors. Is
> the Truepower New worth the money compared to the EarthWatts? What
> are the (typically) good quality brands?
>
> Thanks.

Typically is to typify.

One illustration of typical people occurs to be most highly right over
the broadest group of names. What would be atypical about not
spending an additional $20 above your limit, on a 750W Corsair, as
opposed to a 500W Antec/earthwatts, for $75, when the Corsair draws
roughly three times more positive indications at the highest possible
ranking?

The fact that Corsair is endorsed by Custom PC Magazine and Antec by
PC World France ought not to be considered typical, but irrelevant
within the matrix.

Nor, necessarily, is an indication of facevalue you advance.

To say, given a possible poll of 2000 reviews to read, Japanese
capacitors will be the deciding factor in your decision: what would
you think might be of influence if you could and then should be
influenced to spend some more money?

And last for less, but not inclusive. Is there a lower limit on what
you would consider not worth spending? And, if that limit arbitrarily
were say, $40, would that amount be worth factoring at a field for a
third additional for some discount off by up to 20% from the highest
best either the Antec for Corsair objectifies?

Inclusive would be the model I believe I'm likely now to be running
(I'd have to open the case to ascertain certifiability), a
Thermaltake. Though highest polled, would you think any less of my
Thermaltake on matrixes, at about 15% off form a lower stated
objective 500W is indicative to you.

Do you know how to identify what two fields typify an arrangement on
NewEgg, I've used to draw a matrix of all possible power supplies most
likely to be encountered?
From: John Doe on 17 Feb 2010 18:37
Flasherly <Flasherly(a)live.com> wrote:

> On Feb 16, 8:07 pm, John Doe <j...(a)usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>> Apparently, the Antec Truepower New uses Japanese capacitors.
>> Is the Truepower New worth the money compared to the
>> EarthWatts? What are the (typically) good quality brands?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Typically is to typify.
>
> One illustration of typical people occurs to be most highly
> right over the broadest group of names. What would be atypical
> about not spending an additional $20 above your limit, on a 750W
> Corsair, as opposed to a 500W Antec/earthwatts, for $75, when
> the Corsair draws roughly three times more positive indications
> at the highest possible ranking?
>
> The fact that Corsair is endorsed by Custom PC Magazine and
> Antec by PC World France ought not to be considered typical, but
> irrelevant within the matrix.
>
> Nor, necessarily, is an indication of facevalue you advance.
>
> To say, given a possible poll of 2000 reviews to read, Japanese
> capacitors will be the deciding factor in your decision: what
> would you think might be of influence if you could and then
> should be influenced to spend some more money?

You should spend less on methamphetamines...
--


















>
> And last for less, but not inclusive. Is there a lower limit on
> what you would consider not worth spending? And, if that limit
> arbitrarily were say, $40, would that amount be worth factoring
> at a field for a third additional for some discount off by up to
> 20% from the highest best either the Antec for Corsair
> objectifies?
>
> Inclusive would be the model I believe I'm likely now to be
> running (I'd have to open the case to ascertain certifiability),
> a Thermaltake. Though highest polled, would you think any less
> of my Thermaltake on matrixes, at about 15% off form a lower
> stated objective 500W is indicative to you.
>
> Do you know how to identify what two fields typify an
> arrangement on NewEgg, I've used to draw a matrix of all
> possible power supplies most likely to be encountered?
>

From: Flasherly on 17 Feb 2010 19:24
On Feb 17, 6:37 pm, John Doe <j...(a)usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

> You should spend less on methamphetamines...

Yes, the information I provided was too high.

Let me correct that, a highest-reviewed power supply I'm running is
$25 while its current rebate lasts.

Happy hunting and don't spend it all at once. . . :)
From: John Doe on 17 Feb 2010 20:00
Have you ever actually measured the power that your PC consumes?

I was ready to play along with the "YOU NEED A 1000 WATT POWER
SUPPLY!!!" people, but apparently that was not the problem here.

The idea that modern systems actually use 500-1000 watts still
sounds rediculous. The makers increase the power output probably
just to keep up with the silly idea that a more power hungry
supply means a faster system and that power requirements are
increasing as systems get REALLY REALLY FAST!!!

Someday, I need to buy or borrow a power measurement device, the
kind that clamp onto the power cord without having to touch any
conductors, then get a real idea of PC power consumption.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: %%% top 10 Lovely place for Lovers %%%%
Next: anybody ever had a problem with download.com or avg?