From: Ian Bell on 29 Mar 2010 15:42 Jan Panteltje wrote: > Anybody know a decent scanner that works in Linux? > Preferably not Canon. I have an HP C5280 all in one PSC that works fine with sane. Cheers Ian
From: Jan Panteltje on 29 Mar 2010 18:57 On a sunny day (Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:05:35 -0700) it happened Fred Abse <excretatauris(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in <pan.2010.03.29.19.53.48.153804(a)invalid.invalid>: >On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:58:43 +0000, Jan Panteltje wrote: > >> Anybody know a decent scanner that works in Linux? >> Preferably not Canon. > >I've been using a cheapo Mustek 1240UB for years. Works fine. Uses the >GT68XX SANE driver. 1200 DPS maximum, color, grayscale, and 1-bit B&W. Hi, OK, yes I had a Mustek DVD player, it was mechanically and electrically 'feeble'. So I put it with the trash. I did play anything though, but started damaging my disks.
From: Jan Panteltje on 29 Mar 2010 19:06 On a sunny day (Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:55:13 +0100) it happened Tim Watts <tw(a)dionic.net> wrote in <hoqm1i$2ir$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> > wibbled on Monday 29 March 2010 15:58 > >> Anybody know a decent scanner that works in Linux? >> Preferably not Canon. > >HP are quite good, if it's supported by HPLIP: > >http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/supported_devices/index.html > >I have a Photosmart C6100 3-in-1 printer which supports scanning over >ethernet & WIFI as well as USB. > >I agree about the Canons - I chose and supported the ImageRunners (big >things) under linux at a previous place. Nice machines and fairly student >resistant, but it was hard work tweaking the finer points like duplex, >stapling etc (we had the postscript interpreter option to make like easier). >It was only because we wanted 8 or so of the machines that the rep made sure >I had direct access to the 3rd line support from whence came many mini- >cookbooks of obscure codes (mostly a bastardised PJL ripoff, but you had to >get the order right in some cases in non intuitive ways). > >-- >Tim Watts OK, here what happened, I needed to do some paperwork and make copies.. So I normally use my canoscan 3000ex scanner on an old Win98 install, and then print in Linux or windows for the copies on my Epson R200, with continuous ink system, as that costs next to nothing. I had planned an hour to do the paperwork, but the Canon scanner no longer was recognised in windows. Now 5 hours later, after taking apart the scanner, my hole schedule messed up, a driver re-install fixed it in windows. Why re-install? I had not even used it for maybe month! So Billy The Gates is not welcome here, unless he pays me for extra time. (time wasted). That MS OS is probably the largest source of irritation in this universe, and possibly, or likely the cause of the biggest drop in real industrial output. So, anyways, Canon driver, Canon is very good optically, but they should really support Linux, as MS soft will give them a lousy image.
From: Jan Panteltje on 29 Mar 2010 19:08 On a sunny day (Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:56:08 -0500) it happened AZ Nomad <aznomad.3(a)PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in <slrnhr1tu8.p43.aznomad.3(a)ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>: >On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:58:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>Anybody know a decent scanner that works in Linux? >>Preferably not Canon. > >epsons work great >jfgi That depends, the Epson scanners I can get here at reasonable price need a driver that so far does not compile, misses header files, and is not even totally free.
From: Jan Panteltje on 29 Mar 2010 19:08 On a sunny day (Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:42:18 +0100) it happened Ian Bell <ruffrecords(a)yahoo.com> wrote in <hoqvqk$qae$1(a)localhost.localdomain>: >Jan Panteltje wrote: >> Anybody know a decent scanner that works in Linux? >> Preferably not Canon. > > >I have an HP C5280 all in one PSC that works fine with sane. > >Cheers > >Ian Yep. I am looking at HP too.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Sharp RGBY Televisions Next: simulating a digital control loop |