Anyone else?
in [Word VBA]
|
From: Michaelcip on 27 May 2010 19:19 Does anyone else have any suggestions for this dillema that I find myself in? Thanks in advance, MC
From: Doug Robbins - Word MVP on 28 May 2010 02:22 The only thing that I can gather from your post is that you need to use the spelling checker. The grammar could be better too. -- Hope this helps. Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my services on a paid consulting basis. Doug Robbins - Word MVP, originally posted via msnews.microsoft.com "Michaelcip" <Michaelcip(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:B6EF553F-9538-44EE-BC74-127081A880F4(a)microsoft.com... > Does anyone else have any suggestions for this dillema that I find myself > in? > Thanks in advance, MC
From: Michaelcip on 3 Jun 2010 12:51 Thank-you very much Doug "Dirtbag" Robbins - Word MVP, I appreciate your sense of humor. (And) your comment did help very much; I learned that when you add a post to the top tier of your o.g. post it creates a NEW post. As well, we have folks in our forum that place a strong emphasis on spelling/grammar. Thanks, MC "Doug Robbins - Word MVP" wrote: > The only thing that I can gather from your post is that you need to use the > spelling checker. The grammar could be better too. > > -- > Hope this helps. > > Please reply to the newsgroup unless you wish to avail yourself of my > services on a paid consulting basis. > > Doug Robbins - Word MVP, originally posted via msnews.microsoft.com > > "Michaelcip" <Michaelcip(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:B6EF553F-9538-44EE-BC74-127081A880F4(a)microsoft.com... > > Does anyone else have any suggestions for this dillema that I find myself > > in? > > Thanks in advance, MC >
From: Fumei2 via OfficeKB.com on 3 Jun 2010 14:04 Now now. That is rude. How is anyone to know there is anything else from you? We look at a post as it is. And, as it is, the post says nothing. I too have no idea what your dilemma is. The comment re: grammar...well, perhaps a little snarky, but it decidely does not call for you to use terms like dirtbag. Michaelcip wrote: >Thank-you very much Doug "Dirtbag" Robbins - Word MVP, I appreciate your >sense of humor. (And) your comment did help very much; I learned that when >you add a post to the top tier of your o.g. post it creates a NEW post. As >well, we have folks in our forum that place a strong emphasis on >spelling/grammar. Thanks, MC > >> The only thing that I can gather from your post is that you need to use the >> spelling checker. The grammar could be better too. >> >> > Does anyone else have any suggestions for this dillema that I find myself >> > in? >> > Thanks in advance, MC -- Gerry Message posted via OfficeKB.com http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/word-programming/201006/1
From: Fumei2 via OfficeKB.com on 3 Jun 2010 14:09
Further, your subject "Anyone else" is rude in itself. You got a good answer from macropod suggesting you look at his tutuorial on using dates. This is the best (by far) source of information on using dates available. I know of no other source as detailed and complete. And...you just ignore it? You do not even make ANY comment on it, just a post about "anyone else?" If that suggestions does not work for you...say so, and why. Then possibly someone may suggest something else. As it is, I will not suggest anything else for you (and I probably could), just on principle. Gerry Fumei2 wrote: >Now now. That is rude. How is anyone to know there is anything else from >you? We look at a post as it is. And, as it is, the post says nothing. I >too have no idea what your dilemma is. > >The comment re: grammar...well, perhaps a little snarky, but it decidely does >not call for you to use terms like dirtbag. > >>Thank-you very much Doug "Dirtbag" Robbins - Word MVP, I appreciate your >>sense of humor. (And) your comment did help very much; I learned that when >[quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >>> > in? >>> > Thanks in advance, MC > -- Gerry Message posted via OfficeKB.com http://www.officekb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/word-programming/201006/1 |