From: Dave on
Colin B. wrote:
> Hey all. Feeling a bit of frustration here.
>
> A while ago, I wanted to use ethereal to track some network conversations,
> and discovered that it was renamed (and upgraded) "wireshark."


It builds reasonably easily (albeit very slooooly) from the source. I
must say I am impressed with the wireshark project. It is very well
managed. They have a buildbot which just builds the source on different
machines. If it breaks, it emails the developers with the names of those
who have made changes in the CVS. I've never been a developer, but was
on the developer mailing list some time. I was very impressed with it all.
From: Colin B. on
Oscar del Rio <delrio(a)mie.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> Colin B. wrote:
>> Has anyone looked at the dependencies and sub-dependencies? WS1.0.4 required
>> TWENTY-SIX packages, mostly specific versions!
>>
>> After tracking down every package, making sure the versions all matched
>> up, I finally got it to a point where...
>> ...it doesn't run unless I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. (gag!)
>
> have you tried the wireshark packages from blastwave or opencsw?
> perhaps not the latest versions but probably better than a non-working one.

I guess I'll have to go that way.

The thing that was always appealing about Sunfreeware was that you didn't
need to download a complete build/compile/deploy environment separately
from the OS. Seems a bit moot now, though.

Thanks,
Colin
From: Chris Ridd on
On 2008-12-23 04:30:26 +0000, "Colin B." <cbigam(a)somewhereelse.shaw.ca> said:

> Oscar del Rio <delrio(a)mie.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> Colin B. wrote:
>>> Has anyone looked at the dependencies and sub-dependencies? WS1.0.4 required
>>> TWENTY-SIX packages, mostly specific versions!
>>>
>>> After tracking down every package, making sure the versions all matched
>>> up, I finally got it to a point where...
>>> ...it doesn't run unless I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. (gag!)
>>
>> have you tried the wireshark packages from blastwave or opencsw?
>> perhaps not the latest versions but probably better than a non-working one.
>
> I guess I'll have to go that way.
>
> The thing that was always appealing about Sunfreeware was that you didn't
> need to download a complete build/compile/deploy environment separately
> from the OS. Seems a bit moot now, though.

SunFreeware used not to put dependencies between their packages, or
link using -R. Have they stopped doing that?
--
Chris