From: Joubert on 7 Jul 2010 11:57 Suppose G=G(r,s) is a close, smooth enough path containing the origin. Consider the integral: 1/i2Pi Int_G e^z/z^2 dz My book says this is e^0=1 because this is simply because of Cauchy formula. However it looks like he applies the cauchy formula to e^z/z whose value in zero is definitely not 1. Any hint?
From: Ray Vickson on 7 Jul 2010 14:50 On Jul 7, 8:57 am, Joubert <trappedinthecloset9...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Suppose G=G(r,s) is a close, smooth enough path containing the origin. > Consider the integral: > > 1/i2Pi Int_G e^z/z^2 dz > > My book says this is e^0=1 because this is simply because of Cauchy > formula. However it looks like he applies the cauchy formula to e^z/z > whose value in zero is definitely not 1. > > Any hint? What is [n!/(2*Pi*i)]*int f(z)/(z-a)^(n+1) dz, integrated over a 'nice' closed path having 'a' in its interior? R.G. Vickson
From: Axel Vogt on 7 Jul 2010 14:59 Joubert wrote: > Suppose G=G(r,s) is a close, smooth enough path containing the origin. > Consider the integral: > > 1/i2Pi Int_G e^z/z^2 dz > > My book says this is e^0=1 because this is simply because of Cauchy > formula. However it looks like he applies the cauchy formula to e^z/z > whose value in zero is definitely not 1. > > Any hint? Another hint: what does your book say about residue and Laurent series and what do you get by dividing the Taylor series of exp by z^2 (doing it for each term)?
From: Joubert on 7 Jul 2010 16:13 On 07/07/2010 08:50 PM, Ray Vickson wrote: > What is [n!/(2*Pi*i)]*int f(z)/(z-a)^(n+1) dz, integrated over a > 'nice' closed path having 'a' in its interior? > > R.G. Vickson f'(a) I guess. Now the problem is (sorry I cheated) G is NOT closed. G is instead something like: G(r,s)={z in C: |arg(z)|=s, |z| >= 0} + {z in C:|z|=r, |arg(z)| <= s} with s is in the interval ]Pi/2,Pi[ Is it conceivable that the integral may still be 1 even over such path?
From: Robert Israel on 7 Jul 2010 19:10 > On 07/07/2010 08:50 PM, Ray Vickson wrote: > > > What is [n!/(2*Pi*i)]*int f(z)/(z-a)^(n+1) dz, integrated over a > > 'nice' closed path having 'a' in its interior? > > > > R.G. Vickson > > f'(a) I guess. Not quite... > Now the problem is (sorry I cheated) G is NOT closed. G is instead > something like: > > G(r,s)={z in C: |arg(z)|=s, |z| >= 0} + {z in C:|z|=r, |arg(z)| <= s} > > with s is in the interval ]Pi/2,Pi[ This doesn't quite make sense. Paths in complex analysis have directions, and you haven't indicated any. I suspect you mean |z| >= r (otherwise you'll have convergence problems as z -> 0). So I suppose you have a "keyhole" shaped contour containing two rays extending out to infinity. Now the trick is to replace this by a closed contour that goes out only a finite distance R, and use estimates on |f(z)| to show that the limit as R -> infinity is the integral over your contour. > Is it conceivable that the integral may still be 1 even over such path? -- Robert Israel israel(a)math.MyUniversitysInitials.ca Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Conjecture on integer sequences Next: PROOF INFINITY DOES NOT EXIST! Not even ONE type |