Arctic sea ice extent
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Doppler energy extraction: new solar cell technology
Next: Lunaroleum BP launch with cap&trade "last bailout of Wall St."
From: spudnik on 28 Jun 2010 19:24 in other words, it could be a new ice age (glaciation), which is quite over-due on the orbital synch. now, the floating ice of the Arctic is inherently unstable, compared with the massive pile-ups on Antarctica and Greenland, but the same for the Ross Ice Shelf e.g. (recall, taht really big berg that broke off of it, about the size of Rhode Island or some such, whqat a big deal was made of that. however, it was just a tiny sliver of the Ross Shelf. as for British Petroleum's blow-out, I have to blame it on us Californicators, because we won't drill off of our own coastline (and, now, the legislature is considering a tax on that, since we are the only state that doesn't have one .-) > http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Post-Glacial_Sea_Level_png > the United States! [or maybe manage a BP oil rig] thus&so: you know, the only guy who had a wave named after him in the 20th century, who wasn't surfer-dood? > http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/06/scienceshot-quasar-caug... thus&so: I question that about Franklin, since electrical polarity (and charge) is rather arbitrary, in the first place (although they used to use a flow of positive charges, what is the same as the flow of "holes," today.) anyway, so, what is the problem with Lorentzian dilation of time & length, if it is not apparent within the relativistic frame? doesn't it all boil-down to the fact that the speed (not velocity) of light is the maximum, such that the internal angular momenta of atoms would clearly be limited in the direction of the speed (velocity) of the ship -- is that so hard to see? -- Rep. Waxman, Pres. Obama and BP, les ducs d'oil; the last bailout of Wall St. is cap&trade! http://wlym.com
From: erschroedinger on 29 Jun 2010 11:12 On Jun 28, 5:14 pm, tadchem <tadc...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Jun 26, 3:19 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 6/25/10 11:39 AM, Chumley wrote: > > > > screw the red line, look at the dark green line from 2007 !! Earth was far > > > warmer in 2006 and 2007 than now, we have gotten colder. > > > Look at the rising sea level and tell me it's just not people > > peeing more. > > >http://www.wildwildweather.com/forecastblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/0... > > 2 millimeters a year is not exactly a flood. In fact it is right in > line with the rise since the beginning of the meltdown that ended the > younger dryas glaciation. > > Tom Davidson > Richmond, VA Uh, no, sea level rise is increasing.
From: larryp7639 on 29 Jun 2010 21:35
'Chumley[_2_ Wrote: > ;1551030']"Cwatters" colin.wattersNOSPAM(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com wrote > in message > news:T9adnQyrusSEXrnRnZ2dnUVZ8nudnZ2d(a)brightview.co.uk...- > Remember how back in april the AGW deniers were talking about the sea > ice > recovering? > > Where is that red line going now? > > http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/seaice/extent/AMSRE_Sea_Ice_Extent_L.png > > > - > > screw the red line, look at the dark green line from 2007 !! Earth was > far > warmer in 2006 and 2007 than now, we have gotten colder. Such a very amazing link! -- larryp7639 |