Prev: Home Solar Power Generation
Next: Are space and time separate issues that can be treated in a parallel way.
From: Immortalist on 12 Jul 2010 19:17
On Jul 11, 9:14 pm, "THE BORG" <b...(a)gone.com> wrote:
> "Immortalist" <reanimater_2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8823bde8-cb6a-4dac-8307-eb31d6276c09(a)l25g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > If there is a arrow of time is there a arrow of space?
>
> > If there is a "temporal becoming" is there a "spacial
> > becoming"?
>
> > Time has only one dimension while space has three, and
> > that physical
> > events presuppose both space and time while mental events
> > presuppose,
> > directly at any rate, only time.
>
> You should look at space as SIX dimensions.
> Up, down, right, left, forward back.

Wrong, up and down, point to only one "dimension"; height.

The dimension of a space or object is informally defined as the
minimum number of coordinates needed to specify each point within it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension

> If you only look at with THREE dimensions, space itself
> becomes stagnant as space is infinite and must have the
> commencement point to the rate of SIX.
> Time is linear and modular, and you must remember this, as
> we will talk later of the connection between linear and also
> lateral with regard to the lateral and conceptual
> intelligence of the male.
> With being able to control time, then in a time warp, time
> can expand in all directions and in essence time can become
> space.
> The lineal warp that the stoppage of time produces is one
> where total protection occurs to all inside, as no one can
> access the places where time has ceased.
> A neat maneuver for creating heavens and paradises that you
> want to protect from undesirables.

From: Immortalist on 12 Jul 2010 19:22
On Jul 12, 11:30 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> usually, it's considered to be perpendicular to all
> of the three spatial directions; at least, in some abstract sense.
>
> anyway, I invented the terminology; so ,there.
>
> here:http://www.relativitybook.com/resources/Einstein_space.html
> here:http://www.ctr4process.org/publications/Articles/LSI05/Cahill-
> FinalPa...
>
> --BP's cap™ call the association of brokers group!http://tarpley.net

Isn't time like a satellite view wherein there is a time lapse effect
and, say we could have one picture of 24 hours all blurred together on
the map?

http://www.google.com/images?q=open%20shutter

Did surfers statement about general relativity actually answer these
philosophical questions or was it a hint that sci.physics is not the
place to talk about basic physics?
From: Errol on 13 Jul 2010 03:29
On Jul 12, 5:07 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> If there is a arrow of time is there a arrow of space?
>
> If there is a "temporal becoming" is there a "spacial becoming"?
>
> Time has only one dimension while space has three, and that physical
> events presuppose both space and time while mental events presuppose,
> directly at any rate, only time.
>

It seems to me that time is not a single dimension but an aspect of
each spatial dimension.
I.O.W.s motion along any spatial axis or several at once, occurs
within the temporal aspect of that dimension thus giving 3 time
dimensions. Whether or not these 3 time dimensionsal aspects should be
defined as dimensions is moot. In my opinion (no verification) time
could even be a construct of consciousness and change and motion are
mapped on to each spatial dimension as "time" by consciousness.
From: spudnik on 13 Jul 2010 17:47
this has already been done with quaternions;
see _Variational Mechanics_ by Lanczos. I mean,
that's what vectors & scalars be, by definition; so,
you could legitimately call it "space plus time,"
and there is nothing weird about it, at all ... well,
til Klein went and stringified Kaluza's 4+1 thing,
wich I doubt can be done with ordinary quaternions,
like special rel. can.

Minkowski's sloganeering about spacetime, a mere phasespace,
like Hamiltonians or Lagrangians, was just sophistry. and,
he was a good God-am geometer!

> If Process Physics ultimately makes better predictions than GR, then
> the evidence would be in favor of space + time.

--BP's bailout of Wall St. et les ducs d'oil,
Waxman's *new* cap&trade (circa '91).
http://tarpley.net
From: spudnik on 13 Jul 2010 17:56
on the wayside,
*synthetic* aperature radar, I just had recalled.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Home Solar Power Generation
Next: Are space and time separate issues that can be treated in a parallel way.