Prev: WANTED TO BUY - NETWORKING, TELECOM EQUIPMENT & SOFTWARE - CISCO, NORTEL, LUCENT, JUNIPER, EXTREME, FOUNDRY, FUJITSU, MICROSOFT, ADOBE, SYMANTEC & MORE
Next: Power adapter for Hitachi X Mobile 250G USB hard disk [solved]
From: Flasherly on 30 May 2010 04:28 On May 29, 1:41 pm, "John" <my_name_is_my_...(a)swbell.invalid.net> wrote: > It's been a number of years since I built my pc and want to find out if > there's a site(s) that is designed to provide a list of mobos fitting a > set of specs as a starting point for researching specific ones. > > I'm undecided what direction I want to go yet, so such a site (if there > were one) would let me quickly toss around ideas and mobo feature > combinations. For example, I'd like to develop a list of mobos, mfr > and model number grouped by CPU (for example, P4, dual core, i7) and > relevant features from which I could then do more research. > > Thanks, > > John Tom's Hardware and similar -- or, as easy to get lost in nitty-gritty of hardcore PC forums, as highend stereos for dedicating to $40K speakers. Time you're willing to put up with Google's granularity, a point of competence, where you may not want to go further. Get out of it what goes in . . . want it quick, who's kidding who? Starting set of specs... Most carry sound, many video. Biggest issue is how it boils down to popular reception and reviews, which is apt to be weighed for layering in the newest and a best support across the computer industry infrastructure, CPU/GPU RAM, I/O, processor and video options. And all that means is it's going to be more expensive to implement than something older, reviewing less interesting articles from archive, or budget gear. Budget's cool, but I don't necessarily trust buying old stock, in time harder to support;- nor would I care to do business with a hint of a shop catering in less than conspicuous old stock. Either they say it upfront -- refurbished, pulls, rebadged, etc -- or I'm gone. Whatever. Not at all a focus with better-regarded parts distributors. My personal bias is to center in on the MB make first. I've run a fair sampling of ASUS, MSI, an ABIT here and there. No reason not to consider them past tense, along with others worth considering, such as Gigabyte. The present market yield simply may not be my past inclinations. So I decide on another ASUS, or something else, having done so in time to narrow in on a model. Here's where it starts getting easy -- get the most offered for the money -- then do a once- over on the reviews and product specifications. Way I've done it is on new product, people couldn't figure out how to assemble and returned. Pretty good luck for the most part (sans being shy on videocards overclocked and dead), expecting somewhere around half-off the going price. It can be an offset to learning, getting more than expected features for less, learning to implement and deciding a usefulness to them. As I said, I know the brand's getting good reviews, as well looked over specs and possibly as well researched them. It's reducible to something good if not better than expected, I conceivably might decide to adapt to. I don't go there necessarily looking with prior expectations you want, (unless it's someone in need of help, I'm building for, when I wouldn't do no fooling around, no sir);- just with a general assessment of how well I think I'm up to handling, variously, gear offered. Sometimes it's also fast. Dollar cost averaging if you want to get reducibly even lower, just not too low... I'm above that, and nowadays only habitually hang at the very best bottom-surfing forums, if you get my drift. ;-; |