Prev: Inertia still lying for Einstein
Next: Doctrine of need
From: eric gisse on 26 Jun 2010 20:29
Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:

> On Jun 25, 8:38 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Its' your belief that ignorance is a form of knowledge. You know nothing
>> about modern physics but you feel you have a better grasp of the subject
>> than actual physicists.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Well, even though I probably know more physics than you [...]

Since I have formal training in the subject and you don't, I rather much
doubt that.
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 26 Jun 2010 21:57
On Jun 26, 8:29 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, even though I probably know more physics than you [...]
>
> Since I have formal training in the subject and you don't, I rather much
> doubt that.
-----------------------------------------------------

But you are more than a little uncertain about that, aren't you
Woofster?

RLO
http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw/menu.html


From: Sam Wormley on 26 Jun 2010 23:25
On 6/26/10 8:57 PM, Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:

> RLO
> http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw/menu.html
>
>

Some perspective, Oldershaw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_cosmology
From: eric gisse on 26 Jun 2010 23:34
Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:

> On Jun 26, 8:29 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Well, even though I probably know more physics than you [...]
>>
>> Since I have formal training in the subject and you don't, I rather much
>> doubt that.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> But you are more than a little uncertain about that, aren't you
> Woofster?

Sorry to convey uncertainty where there is none, Robert.

I am absolutely certain you have no formal training in the subject given
your inability to discuss mathematics beyond a high school level, and
complete unfamiliarity with the scientific method.

>
> RLO
> http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw/menu.html

From: Sam Wormley on 26 Jun 2010 23:45
On 6/25/10 10:36 PM, Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:
> Well, even though I probably know more physics than you, my knowledge
> of postmodern pseudophysics may be a bit limited.

That's pretty obvious from your postings. You refrain from
saying much of anything about physics. Perhaps a more fruitful
approach is to dissect some of your "publications" here on
USENET.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Inertia still lying for Einstein
Next: Doctrine of need