Arrow of Time
in [Relativity]
|
From: Sam Wormley on 9 Jul 2010 00:16 On 7/8/10 6:58 AM, bert wrote: > > I have worked out a 5th force,and it is "Time moving backwards" It is > very profound thinking. It is my last and most far out theory. Reality > is it takes away the ant-matter theory. It make GUT reality TreBert Herb, you are starting to remind me of my old crackpot friend, Alexander Abian from Iowa State. > From: abian(a)iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) > Newsgroups: sci.math > Subject: THE ABIAN LIST > Date: 12 Jan 95 23:19:24 GMT > Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa > NNTP-Posting-Host: pv3449.vincent.iastate.edu > > > THE ABIAN LIST > > > 1. Time has inertia., Equivalence of Time and Mass. > > 2. Gravity is a reaction to expansion. > Space tends to lump together masses in a reservation camp in > an attempt to (even partially) preserve the status quo of > its primordial primarily almost matter-free neutrality. > > 3. Photon propulsion (radiation or emission) which is a most > fundamental concept of the modern Physics is spaces's attempt > to dilute (whenever possible) the concentrated presence of > the intruding matter again in order to preserve the status > quo of its almost matter-free neutrality. > > (2 and 3 may sound contradictory - but they are not - all > depends on the circumstances). > > 4. A Black holes (if it exists) is a concentration (via > refraction) of Gravity rays in the focal points of > Cosmic lenses (formed by a suitable configuration of cosmic > bodies) akin to the concentration of light rays > in the focal points of optic lenses. Also akin to formation > of Lasers. > > 5. Reorbiting Venus into an Earth-like orbit to create a > Born again Earth. Reigniting Jupiter into a born again Sun. > > 6. Repulsion of like electric charges is Space's reaction to > the tendency of maintaining its electric neutrality. > > 7. Repulsion of like magnetic poles is Space's reaction to > reduce the number of active magnetic poles as Space's > attempt and tendency of maintaining its magnetic neutrality. > > 8. Nuclear chain reactions, atomic and hydrogen bomb explosion, > is a reaction to a provocation of violently unstable matter. > > 9. Sulfuric acid's evaporating a drop of water is an act of > evaporating the intruding enemy and the tendency of maintaining > the status quo of its acidity concentration. > > 10. Altering and reshuffling our entire 8 billion year old decaying > Solar System (in fact, the entire Cosmos) and rejecting the > slavish indoctrination of the "Majestic Celestial Harmony) > which in reality is putrid and corrupt. In particular, > altering Earth's orbit and tilt in order to stop the natural > disasters and calamities and epidemics of deadly diseases such > as plagues, cancer and various immune deficiency syndromes. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > TIME-SPACE HAS INERTIA. EQUIVALENCE OF TIME-SPACE AND MASS1/T+1/log M =1(ABIAN) > ALTER EARTH'S ORBIT AND TILT - STOP EPIDEMICS OF CANCER, CHOLERA, AIDS, ETC. > VENUS MUST BE GIVEN A NEAR EARTH-LIKE ORBIT TO BECOME A BORN AGAIN EARTH >
From: eric gisse on 9 Jul 2010 02:28 Robert L. Oldershaw wrote: > On Jul 8, 9:33 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> self-similarity, does it answer any questions from QM or >> relativity ? > ------------------------- > > It is the correct path to unification of GR, QM and HEP. When are you going to predict the Hydrogen emission spectrum? > > Details at website. > > RLO > www.amherst,.edu/~rloldershaw
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 10 Jul 2010 22:56 From sci.physics.research: "Arrow of Time" A nonlinear dynamical system is deterministic and fully causal, and yet not entirely predictable. It can go from quasi-classical behavior, including periodic behavior, into full or partial chaotic behavior, and back again. A NLDS has a definite "arrow" and you can call it the arrow of time, or the arrow of determinism, or the arrow of causality. They are all different "facets of the same crystal". The key issue here is that you do not have to invent untestable hypothetical "multiverse" pipe-dreams in order to explain the arrow. If you have an NLDS on any scale, microscopic or macroscopic, then you have a local arrow for that system on that scale. This is the reason you cannot unscramble your scrambled eggs. It has nothing remotely to do with the Big Bang, or pre-Big Bang physics. Then the question is: how common are NLDS? My intuition and observations suggest that the answer is: highly ubiquitous. I would ask: what well-studied, and observed at high resolution, physical systems are not NLDS? Back to topic, RLO www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
From: Thomas Heger on 14 Jul 2010 05:33
Robert L. Oldershaw schrieb: > From sci.physics.research: "Arrow of Time" > > A nonlinear dynamical system is deterministic > and fully causal, and yet not entirely predictable. > It can go from quasi-classical behavior, > including periodic behavior, into full or > partial chaotic behavior, and back again. > > A NLDS has a definite "arrow" and you can > call it the arrow of time, or the arrow of > determinism, or the arrow of causality. They > are all different "facets of the same crystal". > > The key issue here is that you do not have to > invent untestable hypothetical "multiverse" > pipe-dreams in order to explain the arrow. > If you have an NLDS on any scale, microscopic > or macroscopic, then you have a local arrow for > that system on that scale. This is the reason > you cannot unscramble your scrambled eggs. > It has nothing remotely to do with the Big Bang, > or pre-Big Bang physics. > > Then the question is: how common are NLDS? > My intuition and observations suggest that > the answer is: highly ubiquitous. > > I would ask: what well-studied, and observed > at high resolution, physical systems are not NLDS? That is a system, that has no time dependence. That is what we call a potential. But I think, this is kind of an optical illusion, because we deliberately split off such behavior under certain conditions. These conditions require a specific axis of time, for what those systems are stable. If the axis would be altered - by e.g. acceleration - we would see, that even potentials could 'wiggle'. This is an every-day-experience we have e.g. in light-bulbs, where the current accelerates the electrons in the wire and we see it radiating. Than even electrons are subject to this and are, what could be called 'imaginary timeless circles'. We could see this, due to their relation to the charge potential. But we know, electrons have also wave behavior. We only need to tilt their axis. TH |