Assembler/Compiler testing
in [ASM]
|
From: Chewy509 on 12 Mar 2006 21:04 o//annabee wrote: > Chewy509 wrote: > > > o//annabee wrote: > >> > >> LOL. I recompile EVERY thing in my code, maybe 100 times a day :)) > >> Thats maybe 1000 routines. > > > > Impressive, got a download link to your assembler? > > Its just Randall writing to confuse. I use the RosAsm assembler to write > on various hobby projects in assembly. I actually never counted my > routines. But there are 12000 code labels in one of my apps. (RosAsm > statistics). On the contrary, I believe it is you that is out to confuse. The OP is about testing the actual assembler/compiler, not about your general applications. So how does recompiling your source code 100 times a day, test the output of the compiler? > > Any notable features, say above RosAsm? (I know that you're secretly > > conspiring against Rene, to overthrow his RosAsm empire with your own > > RosAsm syntax compatible assembler). > > :)) Heh? What ever gave you such an idea? > > Here is a link to what I work on : < http://szmyggenpv.com/ > Hmm... not valid HTML. And oh my eyes, please stop the bleeding! (Doesn't pass the w3c HTML validator on any HTML level)... PS. http://validator.w3.org/ -- Darran (aka Chewy509) brought to you by Google Groups!
From: o//annabee on 12 Mar 2006 22:04 P? Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:04:10 +0100, skrev <Chewy509(a)austarnet.com.au>: > > o//annabee wrote: >> Chewy509 wrote: >> >> > o//annabee wrote: >> >> >> >> LOL. I recompile EVERY thing in my code, maybe 100 times a day :)) >> >> Thats maybe 1000 routines. >> > >> > Impressive, got a download link to your assembler? >> >> Its just Randall writing to confuse. I use the RosAsm assembler to write >> on various hobby projects in assembly. I actually never counted my >> routines. But there are 12000 code labels in one of my apps. (RosAsm >> statistics). > > On the contrary, I believe it is you that is out to confuse. The OP is > about testing the actual assembler/compiler, not about your general > applications. So how does recompiling your source code 100 times a day, > test the output of the compiler? Okey. Then I may have misread something. If Randall himself wants to redo his original statement and explain what he ment, about _me_ compiling RosAsm, in a post replying to _me_ I be happy to read it. He just miss-wrote something. He implied that I was working ON RosAsm, as if I had said so, but I never did. >> > Any notable features, say above RosAsm? (I know that you're secretly >> > conspiring against Rene, to overthrow his RosAsm empire with your own >> > RosAsm syntax compatible assembler). >> >> :)) Heh? What ever gave you such an idea? >> >> Here is a link to what I work on : < http://szmyggenpv.com/ > > > Hmm... not valid HTML. And oh my eyes, please stop the bleeding! > (Doesn't pass the w3c HTML validator on any HTML level)... :))) Good! The validator seems to do its work, indeed. I am much positivly surpriced with it. Good tool indeed. > PS. http://validator.w3.org/ > -- > Darran (aka Chewy509) brought to you by Google Groups! > --
From: Chewy509 on 12 Mar 2006 23:33 \\o//annabee wrote: > Chewy509 wrote: > > >> Here is a link to what I work on : < http://szmyggenpv.com/ > > > > > Hmm... not valid HTML. And oh my eyes, please stop the bleeding! > > (Doesn't pass the w3c HTML validator on any HTML level)... > > :))) Good! The validator seems to do its work, indeed. I am much positivly > surpriced with it. Good tool indeed. So I take it, you'll be updating your website shortly to be nothing but valid HTML? PS. As a token of good will, I'm more than happy to update your website for you, so that's HTML v4.01 Strict w/CSS and also give it a more modern look at the same time... Once at that point, it shouldn't be too hard for you to maintain yourself. PPS. That is a serious offer! (I can't stand websites that look like they're done by a 2 year old using frontpage). -- Darran (aka Chewy509) brought to you by Google Groups!
From: Evenbit on 13 Mar 2006 01:35 Chewy509(a)austarnet.com.au wrote: > \\o//annabee wrote: > > Chewy509 wrote: > > > > >> Here is a link to what I work on : < http://szmyggenpv.com/ > > > > > > > Hmm... not valid HTML. And oh my eyes, please stop the bleeding! > > > (Doesn't pass the w3c HTML validator on any HTML level)... > > > > :))) Good! The validator seems to do its work, indeed. I am much positivly > > surpriced with it. Good tool indeed. > > So I take it, you'll be updating your website shortly to be nothing but > valid HTML? > > PS. As a token of good will, I'm more than happy to update your website > for you, so that's HTML v4.01 Strict w/CSS and also give it a more > modern look at the same time... Once at that point, it shouldn't be too > hard for you to maintain yourself. > > PPS. That is a serious offer! (I can't stand websites that look like > they're done by a 2 year old using frontpage). > Darran, I appeal to you to please offer to help Randall first... "Result: Failed validation, 182 errors" http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.artofasm.com%2F If you look around, nearly all ASM-related sites look like they were written circa '95 (a nicer way of saying "done by a 2 year old using frontpage"). The only defense I can think of is to say that it is part of the ASM culture to "purposely" employ a "circa '95 theme" in proud defiance of modern eye-candy. :) Nathan.
From: sevagK on 13 Mar 2006 01:49
Chewy509(a)austarnet.com.au wrote: > PS. As a token of good will, I'm more than happy to update your website > for you, so that's HTML v4.01 Strict w/CSS and also give it a more > modern look at the same time... Once at that point, it shouldn't be too > hard for you to maintain yourself. > > PPS. That is a serious offer! (I can't stand websites that look like > they're done by a 2 year old using frontpage). > > -- > Darran (aka Chewy509) brought to you by Google Groups! Seems okay to me, no distractions and straight to the point. Wannabee: Your current project looks interesting. -- crashed on my system after closing the About box. Now I can't run it at all anymore. Freezes everytime. You might want to look into it. (WinXP). -sevag.k www.geocities.com/kahlinor |