From: underh20 on 5 Jan 2010 19:42 Our server is running Solaris 10 (01/06). We are getting following errors when upgrading the Oracle to 11G-R2. Any idea how I can resolve this ? Is this have anything to do with the version of Solaris 10 which is (01/06) ? ********************************************************************************************************** INFO: /usr/ccs/bin/as INFO: : error: unknown option '6' /usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option '4' usage: /usr/ccs/bin/as [-V] [-Q{y,n}] [-q] [-s] [-S] [-K {pic,PIC}] [-o objfile] [-L] [-T] [-P [[-Yc,path] [-Ipath] [-Dname] [-Dname=def] [-Uname]]...] [-m [-Ym,path]] [-n] [-ul] [-xF] [-xarch= {v7,v8,v8a,v8plus,v8plusa,v8plusb,v9,v9a,v9b}] [-xcode={pic13,pic32}] file.s... INFO: make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `ntcontab.o' INFO: *** Error code 1 ********************************************************************************************************** The script seems to be pointing to the wrong assembler "as" at this server. Should we be using the gcc in "/usr/sfw/bin" exclusively for the Oracle 11G upgrade script ? Thanks, Bill atlantis> which gcc /usr/local/bin/gcc atlantis> ls -lt /usr/local/bin/gcc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 187348 Sep 6 2000 /usr/local/bin/ gcc atlantis> ls -lt /usr/sfw/bin/gcc -r-xr-xr-x 3 root bin 122260 Jan 22 2005 /usr/sfw/bin/gcc atlantis> /usr/local/bin/gcc -v Using builtin specs. gcc version 2.8.1 atlantis> /usr/sfw/bin/gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs Configured with: /gates/sfw10/builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/ gcc-3.4.3/configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas -- with-gnu-as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld --enable- languages=c,c++ --enable-shared Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath)
From: underh20 on 7 Jan 2010 15:04 Thanks for Frank's earlier note. I just issued the two commands below at our server. My output is definitely from yours. We don't have the patch #118683 as it didn't appear when we did the "- V" option below. The "/usr/ccs/bin/as" also doesn't have the " [-m32] *[-m64]*" in the usage fields. Do you have any idea how we can get the correct version of "/usr/ccs/ bin/as". Hope we can stay with the current version of Solaris 10 i.e., 01/06 since upgrade to the latest version of 10/08 or above is not a version with the time constraint. # /usr/ccs/bin/as -V /usr/ccs/bin/as: Sun Compiler Common 10 Patch 05/06/2005 # # /usr/ccs/bin/as /usr/ccs/bin/as: error: no input filename given usage: /usr/ccs/bin/as [-V] [-Q{y,n}] [-q] [-s] [-S] [-K {pic,PIC}] [-o objfile] [-L] [-T] [-P [[-Yc,path] [-Ipath] [-Dname] [-Dname=def] [-Uname]]...] [-m [-Ym,path]] [-n] [-ul] [-xF] [-xarch= {v7,v8,v8a,v8plus,v8plusa,v8plusb,v9,v9a,v9b}] [-xcode={pic13,pic32}] file.s... # On Jan 6, 12:31 am, Frank Langelage <fr...(a)lafr.de> wrote: > On 06.01.10 01:42, underh20 wrote: > > > Our server is running Solaris 10 (01/06). We are getting following > > errors when upgrading the Oracle to 11G-R2. Any idea how I can resolve > > this ? Is this have anything to do with the version of Solaris 10 > > which is (01/06) ? > > You don't need a C-compiler, only assembler and linker are needed. > > Look into install/make.log > On my system (Solaris 10 6/06 with all available patches applied) there > are the following lines: > /opt/oracle/11gR2/bin/gennttab > ntcontab.s ;\ > /usr/ccs/bin/as -P *-m64* -o ntcontab.o ntcontab.s ;\ > rm -f /opt/oracle/11gR2/lib/ntcontab.o ;\ > mv ntcontab.o /opt/oracle/11gR2/lib/ ;\ > /usr/ccs/bin/ar rv /opt/oracle/11gR2/lib/libn11.a > /opt/oracle/11gR2/lib/ntcontab.o ; fi) > ar: /opt/oracle/11gR2/lib/libn11.a wird geschrieben > r - ntcontab.o > > So on your system the used assembler is the same but this version > doesn't understand the 64-bit option I guess. > > root(a)sb2000: /usr/ccs/bin/as -V > /usr/ccs/bin/as: SunOS 5.10 118683-04 Patch 10/05/2009 > > root(a)sb2000: /usr/ccs/bin/as > /usr/ccs/bin/as: error: no input filename given > usage: /usr/ccs/bin/as [-V] [-Q{y,n}] [-q] [-s] > [-S] [-K {pic,PIC}] [-o objfile] [-L] [-T] > [-P [[-Yc,path] [-Ipath] [-Dname] [-Dname=def] [-Uname]]...] > [-m [-Ym,path]] [-n] [-ul] [-xF] > [-m32] *[-m64]* > > [-xarch={v7,v8,v8a,v8plus,v8plusa,v8plusb,v9,v9a,v9b,sparc,sparcvis, > sparcvis2,sparcfmaf,sparcima}] > [-xcode={pic13,pic32}] file.s...
From: ravi on 20 Jan 2010 06:29 On 8 Jan, 01:49, Frank Langelage <fr...(a)lafr.de> wrote: > On 07.01.10 21:04, underh20 wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for Frank's earlier note. > > > I just issued the two commands below at our server. My output is > > definitely from yours. > > We don't have the patch #118683 as it didn't appear when we did the "- > > V" option below. > > The "/usr/ccs/bin/as" also doesn't have the " [-m32] *[-m64]*" in the > > usage fields. > > Do you have any idea how we can get the correct version of "/usr/ccs/ > > bin/as". Hope > > we can stay with the current version of Solaris 10 i.e., 01/06 since > > upgrade to > > the latest version of 10/08 or above is not a version with the time > > constraint. > > you don't have to upgrade the whole system to a more current Solaris > release. > But you'll have to install a patch. > The options for 32-/64-bit where introduced with the /usr/ccs/bin/as in > patch 118683-02. > The current version of this patch is -04. > Seehttp://sunsolve.sun.com/patchfinder/?patchId=118683. > As far as I could see there are no dependencies to other patches. we also come across this situation, but we reinstalled OS with u6 version. let us know once the above patch is resolved..
|
Pages: 1 Prev: ldom host cannot see ldom primary Next: patchadd rejects sun studio patches |