Prev: Load RTF in Word
Next: h2inc
From: Drew on 17 Dec 2009 17:37
I have an out-of-proc ATL server w/MFC support using VS2008 SP1. When the
DLL is registered or instatiatiated by a client I receive two assertions
during DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH.

The following line in dllinit.cpp line 587 (AfxCoreInitModule()) is causing
the first assertion failiure:

ASSERT(AfxGetModuleState() != AfxGetAppModuleState());

If I ignore this the following line in dllmodul.cpp line 135
(InternalDllMain()) is causing the second assertion failure:

VERIFY(AfxSetModuleState(AfxGetThreadState()->m_pPrevModuleState) ==
&afxModuleState);

Is this something that can be prevented?

Thanks,
Drew


From: Drew on 17 Dec 2009 18:42
Oops. Make that an in-proc ATL server.

"Drew" <dam(a)dam.com> wrote in message
news:uuf3kn2fKHA.2104(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I have an out-of-proc ATL server w/MFC support using VS2008 SP1. When the
>DLL is registered or instatiatiated by a client I receive two assertions
>during DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH.
>
> The following line in dllinit.cpp line 587 (AfxCoreInitModule()) is
> causing the first assertion failiure:
>
> ASSERT(AfxGetModuleState() != AfxGetAppModuleState());
>
> If I ignore this the following line in dllmodul.cpp line 135
> (InternalDllMain()) is causing the second assertion failure:
>
> VERIFY(AfxSetModuleState(AfxGetThreadState()->m_pPrevModuleState) ==
> &afxModuleState);
>
> Is this something that can be prevented?
>
> Thanks,
> Drew
>


From: David Ching on 17 Dec 2009 20:21
"Drew" <dam(a)dam.com> wrote in message
news:OpzL3L3fKHA.1540(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Oops. Make that an in-proc ATL server.
>

Are you using MFC DLL or static linking? Are you sure you have defined
_USRDLL, etc. appropriately?

-- David

From: Drew on 18 Dec 2009 11:05

"David Ching" <dc(a)remove-this.dcsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O6H7$B4fKHA.2184(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Drew" <dam(a)dam.com> wrote in message
> news:OpzL3L3fKHA.1540(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Oops. Make that an in-proc ATL server.
>>
>
> Are you using MFC DLL or static linking? Are you sure you have defined
> _USRDLL, etc. appropriately?
>
> -- David

I am using MFC DLL. I didn't have _USRDLL defined but it didn't make any
difference. I did (and do) have _AFXDLL and _WINDLL defined. Am I maybe
mixing and matching these incorrectly?

Thanks,
Drew


From: David Ching on 19 Dec 2009 09:12
"Drew" <dam(a)dam.com> wrote in message
news:ea20Cx$fKHA.2188(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> I am using MFC DLL. I didn't have _USRDLL defined but it didn't make any
> difference. I did (and do) have _AFXDLL and _WINDLL defined. Am I maybe
> mixing and matching these incorrectly?
>

What I would do is use AppWizard to create a new dummy ActiveX control and
make sure you don't have the same assertion problem with this. Then copy
your code into this new project.

-- David


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Load RTF in Word
Next: h2inc