From: Paul on 7 Feb 2010 18:06 McCorkindale wrote: > > "Paul" <nospam(a)needed.com> wrote in message > news:hkmtfh$5pl$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> McCorkindale wrote: >>> I have this mo/bo running Core 2 CPU 6600/ @2.40 GHz for some time now >>> and I would like to upgrade this CPU. I wonder weather there is >>> someone who >>> runs this m/b with much faster CPU. Any information on this topic >>> will be >>> greatly appreciated. >>> >>> jdr >> >> It's much more economical to just overclock your Q6600. For the small >> step in stock speed you'll get from an upgrade, it just isn't worth it. >> >> http://support.asus.com.tw/cpusupport/cpusupport.aspx?SLanguage=en-us&model=P5B%20Deluxe >> >> >> You should be able to get at least 3GHz from it, by overclocking. You >> can look through the reviews here for the Q6600 and see what >> ordinary users managed to get from it, by overclocking. >> >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductReview.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017 >> >> Paul > > > Thank you Paul, > Somehow, I'm not convinced that is exactly the same. > It depends what want to achieve. I was thinking about > replacing the present CPU (Core 2) with core 2 Quad. > In this case in want be only speed but in volume as well > playing quite important part. > > But I take your point and see into it. > > Jdr > > OK, so your original processor is an E6600 and not a Q6600. My mistake. There is more room to upgrade then. Additional cores help, if the software you use is multi-core aware, and spreads the task over all the cores. Not all software will do that. Just so you know what to expect. Some multimedia software is multi-core aware, so perhaps some kinds of movie editing or rendering applications will run faster. The fastest reasonably priced processor is the Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz 12MB L2 Cache at $270. Faster than this gets too expensive (and you should consider LGA1156 or LGA1366 motherboards and processors instead in that case). http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115041 The Q8300 Core 2 Quad 2.5GHz 4MB L2 Cache is $149. It is an FSB1333 part. It would give you about double the performance with the right application running (and using all cores). http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115207 Looking at the reviews on Newegg for your P5B Deluxe motherboard, one person managed to get the FSB clock up to 500 MHz or FSB2000. If you started with a FSB1333 processor and got it to run FSB2000, you'd have a bit of overclocking headroom. So you might manage to squeeze a bit more from your Q8300. It is a 45nm part, so watch out for applying too much Vcore boost. Check one of the enthusiast sites, to verify the limit is 1.4 volts. I think the 45nm processors don't last very long, if you give them more voltage than that. Extra voltage is only needed if you're trying for a large overclock. If you plan to leave it at stock 2.5GHz speed, then there is no need for a voltage boost. Reading the Newegg reviews for the Q8300, it isn't a huge overclocker. Maybe somewhere between 2.8Ghz and 3.1GHz or so. So between the motherboard and the CPU, the CPU is probably the limiting factor to overclocking. Paul
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: P7P55D-E Pro OV Dram switch position confusion Next: p5q deluxe esata port not working |