From: clayss on 21 Jan 2010 08:15 How does an FIR asymmetric bandpass filter perform differently than a symmetric bandpass filter with the same magnitude and phase response at positive frequencies?
From: Rune Allnor on 21 Jan 2010 08:21 On 21 Jan, 14:15, "clayss" <cshe...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > How does an FIR asymmetric bandpass filter perform differently than a > symmetric bandpass filter with the same magnitude and phase response at > positive frequencies? Depends on what kind of asymmetry you mean: Time-domain symmetry means that the frequency response has linear phase. So a FIR that is asymmetric in time domain will have non-linear phase in frequency domain. Conjugate symmetry in frequency domain means the time-domain impulse response is real-valued. If the frequency response is not conjugate symmetric, the time-domain impulse response becomes complex-valued. Rune
From: Clay on 21 Jan 2010 16:02 On Jan 21, 8:15 am, "clayss" <cshe...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > How does an FIR asymmetric bandpass filter perform differently than a > symmetric bandpass filter with the same magnitude and phase response at > positive frequencies? You have a contradictory requirement in your question. An asymmtric FIR filter is easily decomposed into the sum of a symmetric and an antisymmtric FIR filter. The antisymmtric part has a 90 degree phase shift. So if your filter is asymmetric how can it both simultaneously match the magnitude and phase response of a symmetric FIR filter even if just looking at positive frequencies. The symmetric FIR filter's phase repsonse is a zero degree phase shift apart from the overall delay required for causality. IHTH, Clay
|
Pages: 1 Prev: midi lyrics Next: implementing an fpga based on hilbert transform |