Prev: For the first time-an inner contradiction found in QM !!!
Next: A Lesson In Sagnac and Rotating frames, For Paul, Tom and Jerry.
From: john on 11 Feb 2010 10:21
On Feb 11, 9:05 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 12:53 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 10, 9:18 pm, Don Stockbauer <don.stockba...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 10, 10:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Flat atoms or contracted atoms don't exist in physics. They have been
> > > > swept away.
>
> > > > The electrons would be too close to the nucleus.
>
> > > Flat atoms.  Sure wouldn't want to use them in soft drinks.
>
> > If you sped up pop to near light speeds it would go flat. I doubt it.
>
> To Ya All(Fl.talk)   Everything in micro realm has to be round and
> spinning. It has to be supersymmetrical.  That goes with my "Spin is
> in Theory   TreBert

The only difference between macro and micro
is size. What you see out there is the
same as what there is among atoms.

john
From: PD on 11 Feb 2010 13:13
On Feb 10, 10:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Flat atoms or contracted atoms don't exist in physics. They have been
> swept away.
>
> The electrons would be too close to the nucleus.

Too close for what? What do you think would happen?

>
> Mitch Raemsch

From: Uncle Al on 11 Feb 2010 13:43
PD wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 10:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Flat atoms or contracted atoms don't exist in physics. They have been
> > swept away.
> >
> > The electrons would be too close to the nucleus.
>
> Too close for what? What do you think would happen?
>
> >
> > Mitch Raemsch

238U(91+) has a Lamb shift of 459.8 eV not an inverse beta-decay,

<http://www-linux.gsi.de/~stoe_exp/research/experiments/lamb_shift/cooler.php>

Raemsch is a flea turd boasting it is an owl pellet.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: BURT on 11 Feb 2010 20:07
On Feb 11, 10:13 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 10:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Flat atoms or contracted atoms don't exist in physics. They have been
> > swept away.
>
> > The electrons would be too close to the nucleus.
>
> Too close for what? What do you think would happen?
>
Either you would go blind or you would being to see PD.

>
>
>
> > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: For the first time-an inner contradiction found in QM !!!
Next: A Lesson In Sagnac and Rotating frames, For Paul, Tom and Jerry.