Atoms are round hard things that don't go flat
in [Physics]
|
Prev: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
Next: IN 2003, ARINDAM BANERJEE BROUGHT GLORY TO OUTLOOK MAGAZINE by outing e=mcc for ever
From: john on 11 Feb 2010 10:21 On Feb 11, 9:05 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > On Feb 11, 12:53 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 10, 9:18 pm, Don Stockbauer <don.stockba...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 10, 10:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Flat atoms or contracted atoms don't exist in physics. They have been > > > > swept away. > > > > > The electrons would be too close to the nucleus. > > > > Flat atoms. Sure wouldn't want to use them in soft drinks. > > > If you sped up pop to near light speeds it would go flat. I doubt it. > > To Ya All(Fl.talk) Everything in micro realm has to be round and > spinning. It has to be supersymmetrical. That goes with my "Spin is > in Theory TreBert The only difference between macro and micro is size. What you see out there is the same as what there is among atoms. john
From: PD on 11 Feb 2010 13:13 On Feb 10, 10:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Flat atoms or contracted atoms don't exist in physics. They have been > swept away. > > The electrons would be too close to the nucleus. Too close for what? What do you think would happen? > > Mitch Raemsch
From: Uncle Al on 11 Feb 2010 13:43 PD wrote: > > On Feb 10, 10:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Flat atoms or contracted atoms don't exist in physics. They have been > > swept away. > > > > The electrons would be too close to the nucleus. > > Too close for what? What do you think would happen? > > > > > Mitch Raemsch 238U(91+) has a Lamb shift of 459.8 eV not an inverse beta-decay, <http://www-linux.gsi.de/~stoe_exp/research/experiments/lamb_shift/cooler.php> Raemsch is a flea turd boasting it is an owl pellet. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: BURT on 11 Feb 2010 20:07
On Feb 11, 10:13 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 10, 10:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Flat atoms or contracted atoms don't exist in physics. They have been > > swept away. > > > The electrons would be too close to the nucleus. > > Too close for what? What do you think would happen? > Either you would go blind or you would being to see PD. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |