Prev: Quantiative Science Before Galileo, Venetian Party friend of Pope Urban -- BP's cap&trade?
Next: SPACEBALLS FOUND IN DISTANT GALAXY
From: BURT on 23 Jul 2010 00:12
The proton and electron would attract each other in a kind of double
attraction originating from both their fields. They would come
together under attraction and form neutronium. We could manufacture
neutronium this way if it was right. Clearly their attraction in
todays physics is wrong. There is only one electric pole and it is
always repulsive for both the proton and electron and amongst the two.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 23 Jul 2010 08:18
On Jul 22, 11:12 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> The proton and electron would attract each other in a kind of double
> attraction originating from both their fields. They would come
> together under attraction and form neutronium. We could manufacture
> neutronium this way if it was right. Clearly their attraction in
> todays physics is wrong. There is only one electric pole and it is
> always repulsive for both the proton and electron and amongst the two.

You are always so wrong, "BURT-MITCH-RALPH". We have lots of
electric poles out here!

From: BURT on 23 Jul 2010 15:39
On Jul 23, 5:18 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 22, 11:12 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > The proton and electron would attract each other in a kind of double
> > attraction originating from both their fields. They would come
> > together under attraction and form neutronium. We could manufacture
> > neutronium this way if it was right. Clearly their attraction in
> > todays physics is wrong. There is only one electric pole and it is
> > always repulsive for both the proton and electron and amongst the two.
>
> You are always so wrong, "BURT-MITCH-RALPH".   We have lots of
> electric poles out here!

If electrons and protons attract they would form neutronium when they
come together.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Jacko on 23 Jul 2010 15:51
On 23 July, 05:12, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> The proton and electron would attract each other in a kind of double
> attraction originating from both their fields. They would come
> together under attraction and form neutronium. We could manufacture
> neutronium this way if it was right. Clearly their attraction in
> todays physics is wrong. There is only one electric pole and it is
> always repulsive for both the proton and electron and amongst the two.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Only if the same charges had no repulsion. So it's -t neutronium vs. -
t protonium plus -t electronium.
From: BURT on 23 Jul 2010 16:03
On Jul 23, 12:51 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 July, 05:12, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > The proton and electron would attract each other in a kind of double
> > attraction originating from both their fields. They would come
> > together under attraction and form neutronium. We could manufacture
> > neutronium this way if it was right. Clearly their attraction in
> > todays physics is wrong. There is only one electric pole and it is
> > always repulsive for both the proton and electron and amongst the two.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Only if the same charges had no repulsion. So it's -t neutronium vs. -
> t protonium plus -t electronium.

Mutual repulsion between themselves does not illiminate the attraction
with the opposite charged particle. They would come together under
attraction and form neutronium.

Mitch Raemsch
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Quantiative Science Before Galileo, Venetian Party friend of Pope Urban -- BP's cap&trade?
Next: SPACEBALLS FOUND IN DISTANT GALAXY