From: BURT on
On Jul 30, 5:35 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 7/30/2010 2:01 PM, BURT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 30, 2:25 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> >> On 7/29/2010 11:08 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> >>> On Jul 29, 9:05 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>    wrote:
> >>>> On 7/29/2010 7:52 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Jul 29, 5:49 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>> You appear to be creating a new force that is not part of any existing
> >>>>>> model. Therefore you must fully describe what you are suggesting along
> >>>>>> with proofs.-
>
> >>>>> The electrons don't bond to the nucleus. They bond to their eelctron
> >>>>> shells by elctric field energy. I challenge you on that.
>
> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch
>
> >>>> You can't challenge me, it isn't my idea, you have to prove it.
>
> >>>> How many times will it take for you to understand that if you
> >>>> propose a new theory you are the one who has to prove it. If
> >>>> you cannot prove it, you should shut up.
>
> >>>> Now, where's your proof?
>
> > The proof is their attraction never brings them together.
> > I challenge by that.
>
> >> It is not proof.
>
> > What other evidence for attraction can there be?
>
> Let's take a larger model with some similarities, and some equivalence,
> to the atomic model, our solar system.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_model
>
> There is an attraction between every element in the solar system, yet,
> for the most part, they never come together.
>
> The simple fact that the elements remain in their various orbits, for
> some millions of years, is evidence of the attraction among them.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stability_of_the_Solar_System- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

If they never come together by their attraction then it doesn't even
count.

Mitch Raemsch
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: We must move on
Next: Favorite JSH quote