Autonomous transaction
in [PgSql]
|
Prev: [HACKERS] Autonomous transaction
Next: pgsql: Check compulsory parametersin recovery.conf in standby_mode, per
From: Robert Haas on 13 Apr 2010 20:23 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > Yea, having some things in our system be non-transactional is odd and > hard to understand. Just thinking about it, it seems it would introduce > all sorts of odd behaviors. I think it would be really useful, though, for users and maybe even for system internals. Working out the semantics is a challenge, but not an insurmountable one, I think. ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Bruce Momjian on 13 Apr 2010 20:24 Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > > Yea, having some things in our system be non-transactional is odd and > > hard to understand. ?Just thinking about it, it seems it would introduce > > all sorts of odd behaviors. > > I think it would be really useful, though, for users and maybe even > for system internals. Working out the semantics is a challenge, but > not an insurmountable one, I think. Yea, it is going to feel like a ship with a leaky hull, so we are going to have to re-think a bunch of stuff, like how do we handle visibility, cleanout of old rows from UPDATE, etc. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas on 13 Apr 2010 20:25
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: >> I think it would be really useful, though, for users and maybe even >> for system internals. Working out the semantics is a challenge, but >> not an insurmountable one, I think. > > Yea, it is going to feel like a ship with a leaky hull, so we are going > to have to re-think a bunch of stuff, like how do we handle visibility, > cleanout of old rows from UPDATE, etc. Yeah, agreed. ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |