From: Jan Panteltje on
Avalanche Photodetector, IBM, germanium, 1.5V, 40Gbps:
http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/photonics.apd.html
From: Kevin McMurtrie on
In article <hmu3r7$nij$1(a)news.albasani.net>,
Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> Avalanche Photodetector, IBM, germanium, 1.5V, 40Gbps:
> http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/photonics.apd.
> html

Very cool, but made comical by the PR pictures showing snow avalanches.
--
I won't see Google Groups replies because I must filter them as spam
From: Jan Panteltje on
On a sunny day (Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:52:19 -0800) it happened Kevin McMurtrie
<mcmurtrie(a)pixelmemory.us> wrote in
<4b933f13$0$22180$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>:

>In article <hmu3r7$nij$1(a)news.albasani.net>,
> Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Avalanche Photodetector, IBM, germanium, 1.5V, 40Gbps:
>> http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/photonics.apd.
>> html
>
>Very cool, but made comical by the PR pictures showing snow avalanches.

Yes the reality in this world is slowly being replaced by 'artist impresions' and 'simulations'.

Nobody notices, the next mars rovers will actually be just some simulation running on google's computers.
And NASA will still get 100 billion for that mission.

From: John Larkin on
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:52:19 -0800, Kevin McMurtrie
<mcmurtrie(a)pixelmemory.us> wrote:

>In article <hmu3r7$nij$1(a)news.albasani.net>,
> Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Avalanche Photodetector, IBM, germanium, 1.5V, 40Gbps:
>> http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/photonics.apd.
>> html
>
>Very cool, but made comical by the PR pictures showing snow avalanches.

This sort of thing is standard in press-release science. The
application sounds silly to me.

John

From: JosephKK on
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:36:31 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> Avalanche Photodetector, IBM, germanium, 1.5V, 40Gbps:
>http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/photonics.apd.html

Strange, APDs are very sensitive but not usually fast. T(on) may be quick and strong
but t(off) usually seems to be slow and sometimes troubled. Maybe there is some quench
circuitry involved that they are not talking about. Or maybe i, yet again, do not quite
know what i am about, Dr. Hobbs?