Avast Doesn't Block XP Defender malware (ave.exe)
in [Anti-Virus]
|
From: FromTheRafters on 8 Apr 2010 07:51 "Whoever" <whoever(a)wherever.invalid> wrote in message news:Xns9D54498FA4990somewhere(a)69.16.185.247... > "The Real Truth MVP" <trt(a)void.com> wrote in > news:hpj529$tuu$1(a)leythos.motzarella.org: >> >> I Practice yoga regularly and go on 10-mile runs every Sunday.I >> decided to quit smoking when I received fan mail from little girls >> saying they wanted to be like me when they grew up.My dog Meatball >> posed with me in a photo-shoot by photographer Frank Veronsky >> http://www.frankveronsky.com/. I was actually a waitress at the >> Saddle >> Ranch Chop House before I got my big break and landed a recurring >> role >> on TV. I was addicted to the original "Star Trek" when I was growing >> up, because of my dad. We grew up in St. Helens, Oregon and we >> weren't >> allowed to watch a lot of TV. I don't think we even had more than >> three channels, so it was basically watch "Dynasty" with my mom, >> watch >> "Star Trek" with my dad, or watch the mating rituals of beavers on >> OPB >> [Oregon Public Broadcasting]. So my brother and I watched "Star Trek. >> I got involved with computers a long time ago and learned how to fix >> them by myself. I went back to school and got certified, started >> working in a small business and teaching computers. This was all >> before I got my break in acting. Now all my time is spent in front of >> the camera. > > > So now you're Katie Sackhoff? > > http://www.after-darkness.com/showthread.php?t=7382 It even steals its lies from others' works. Nice catch!
From: FromTheRafters on 8 Apr 2010 09:43 "ASCII" <me2(a)privacy.net> wrote in message news:4bbdd7f5.582437(a)EDCBIC... > FromTheRafters wrote: >> >>> And something else while I'm here; >>> How do so many people get plagued by malware bearing trojans if >>> they're all as >>> clean cut above board web surfers as the fantasy suggests? >> >>What fantasy is that? > > The fantasy that folk are all just innocent happy clickers > never venturing into the 'too good to be true' world of bargain > software. > >> >>> Could it be that this group would wither away >>> without all the warez trafficking behavior that >>> is so hypocritically chastised? >> >>The fantasy is that bad behavior is the *only* way to get malware. > > Maybe whatever it is they're doing to get it is indeed "bad behavior"? > Not as obviously bad as pirating stuff but careless operation is as > bad as > heading out on the freeway with no brakes. Today, I believe that that is mostly true. There is too much bad behavior out there to tell if anyone is getting stung despite practicing *good* behavior (aside from the zero year software vulnerability exploit vectors).
From: ~BD~ on 8 Apr 2010 13:19 Leythos wrote: > > Why not respect Usenet yourself? > > Usenet is not a chat group that you can ramble on about any given > subject in any given group - the GROUP NAME DEFINES THE DISCUSSION TYPE > AND CONTENT. > > If you want to "Talk" with people about non-Anti-Virus things, then you > should respect Usenet and how it was intended to be used and take your > discussion to email. > > It's simple to follow Usenet methods, if you care. > Everyone has a different view! Here's an example: <hpkl6h$m5m$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> There, SeaNymph said ........ "This is usenet. I am free to respond whenever and in whatever manner I choose. My choosing to inject my comments is no different than you continuing in a conversation you have been asked to vacate." -- Dave - I *do* care about many things. Usenet - 120,000 groups - Hmm! ;-)
From: Leythos on 8 Apr 2010 13:25 In article <0qGdnVd6od-AjSPWnZ2dnUVZ8nWdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk says... > > It's simple to follow Usenet methods, if you care. > > > > Everyone has a different view! Here's an example: > > <hpkl6h$m5m$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> > > There, SeaNymph said ........ > > "This is usenet. I am free to respond whenever and in whatever manner I > choose. My choosing to inject my comments is no different than you > continuing in a conversation you have been asked to vacate." > Yes, you're right, VIEWS, and if you choose to be one of those radicals that opts for chaos instead of following the standard, well, how does that make you any different than other disruptors in groups? -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 8 Apr 2010 13:32
~BD~ wrote: > Leythos wrote: >> Why not respect Usenet yourself? >> >> Usenet is not a chat group that you can ramble on about any given >> subject in any given group - the GROUP NAME DEFINES THE DISCUSSION >> TYPE AND CONTENT. >> >> If you want to "Talk" with people about non-Anti-Virus things, then >> you should respect Usenet and how it was intended to be used and >> take your discussion to email. >> >> It's simple to follow Usenet methods, if you care. > > Everyone has a different view! Here's an example: > > <snip> > > There, SeaNymph said ........ "SeaNymph" is definitely not a person whose opinion should be used as a reference to describe how Usenet works. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul |