Avast Doesn't Block XP Defender malware (ave.exe)
in [Anti-Virus]
|
From: Leythos on 3 Apr 2010 19:46 In article <XKCdnZrLa7_eJirWnZ2dnUVZ8rmdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk says... > The Real Truth MVP wrote: > > Did you notice how everyone keeps avoiding your question about the > > quality of my software. It's been asked many times and not by you but > > never answered. > > > > > Oh yes, I notice! :) > > Perhaps others posting here don't have the skills required to produce > helpful, working, 'fix it' programmes. Jealous maybe? Who knows. > It's avoided because what can one say about PIRATED CODE. Butts didn't write it, but he has hacked it and the signatures that the authors included to prove it are in butts files that he distributes, so, if he didn't manipulate the files he takes from others, if he didn't do anything to them, how could anyone say they are bad? What you seem to be missing is that HE MODIFIES THE WORKS OF OTHERS, IN UNKNOWN WAYS, SINCE HE DOESN'T PROGRAM AND DOESN'T CODE, AND HE THEN CLAIMS OWNERSHIP. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: gufus on 3 Apr 2010 19:56 Hello, ~BD~! You wrote on Sun, 04 Apr 2010 00:34:13 +0100: | know, but something is odd if TRT's Avast! does catch the rogue file yet | David's doesn't! Yes -- With best regards, gufus. E-mail: stop.nospam.gbbsg(a)shaw.ca
From: FromTheRafters on 3 Apr 2010 20:03 "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:kamdnSv9kbHoTSrWnZ2dnUVZ8lqdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > Maybe David Kaye has not used the very latest virus *update*. I don't > know, but something is odd if TRT's Avast! does catch the rogue file > yet David's doesn't! It is possible for a trojan to drop a file named ave.exe that is for all practical purposes unique to that system. The filename means nothing. The thing that should be detected is the dropper itself - if you don't install it, you don't have to identify and remove it.
From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 3 Apr 2010 20:09 ~BD~ wrote: > TRT said Stop calling him "TRT". He is the exact opposite of the real truth. Have you bothered to do this? http://www.google.com/search?q=pcbutts1+software+thief <quote> From: "Intellectual Property and Licensing Group" <[cut]@microsoft.com> To: "'pcbutts1'" Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:05 PM Subject: RE: Logo use Please provide us your name to verify in our system. </quote> -- The Real Truth: http://www.google.com/search?q=pcbutts1+software+thief *WARNING* Do NOT follow any advice given by the people listed below. They do NOT have the expertise or knowledge to fix your issue. Do not waste your time. PCButtface1, The Not-Real Truth Not-an-MVP, fake-ms-mvp.org
From: David H. Lipman on 3 Apr 2010 20:12
From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> | "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message | news:kamdnSv9kbHoTSrWnZ2dnUVZ8lqdnZ2d(a)bt.com... >> Maybe David Kaye has not used the very latest virus *update*. I don't >> know, but something is odd if TRT's Avast! does catch the rogue file >> yet David's doesn't! | It is possible for a trojan to drop a file named ave.exe that is for all | practical purposes unique to that system. The filename means nothing. | The thing that should be detected is the dropper itself - if you don't | install it, you don't have to identify and remove it. Yes. In fact a web site can offer up different MD5 valued files for something as different as the User-Agent. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp |