From: gnubeard on
On Sep 27, 9:45 pm, p...(a)informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:

> It sounds like they might have inavertently disabled legally their
> DRM, but it will probably be up to a judge to decide wether SLA takes
> precedence over DMCA or the inverse.  If there's a contradiction
> between what they allow you to do with their software, and a DRM
> device inside this software, perhaps USA judges will decide that the
> DRM is prioritary, and that you still cannot modify it.  In any case,
> I can see their lawyers arguing that they meant you were allowed to
> modify lisp sources, and not the virtual machine.

Yeah, that is certainly a possibility. But since I haven't actually
modified LW at all, that shouldn't be an issue either.

All I've done is to utilize an already present feature of the dynamic
linker. A standard feature on UNIX-ish OS's that they choose to
support. If anything is getting modified, it is my copy of the C
standard library, not LW.

Now if I were preloading a lib that interposed over LW's supplied
libraries, that would be a different issue.
From: Lars Rune Nøstdal on
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/87/240803829_9212773615_o.png



From: Dave Searles on
gnubeard wrote:
> On Sep 26, 6:06 pm, Pascal Costanza <p...(a)p-cos.net> wrote:
>
>> How much did your guitar cost?
>
> About $200 USD for the guitar. I built my own amp, and I've dropped a
> total of probably another $150-200 on a couple of used pedals, cables
> and such.
>
> The whole rig is much less than a LispWorks license, if that is what
> you're asking.

That's very interesting. Guitar + other equipment: $350-400. Marginal
cost: $350-400. LispWorks license: north of $1000. Marginal cost: south
of one buck.

What's up with that?
From: Raffael Cavallaro on
On 2009-09-27 12:48:52 -0400, Dave Searles <searles(a)hoombah.nurt.bt.uk> said:

> In fact there's an explicit denial of that: the right of first sale.

He's talking about the free trial version. Since there hasn't been any
sale, it's difficult to invoke the right of first sale.

--
Raffael Cavallaro

From: John Thingstad on
P� Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:02:52 +0200, skrev gnubeard <gnubeard(a)gmail.com>:

> On Sep 27, 7:20 pm, Lieven Marchand <m...(a)wyrd.be> wrote:
> You know, if LW would have done something to maintain/distribute the
> SigLab sources with their product *THAT* would represent significant
> value to me, and I'd pay the $1500, possibly even more depending on
> how much effort was put into it. Or even their own audio/signal
> libraries and visualization tools.
>

You know I was just about to buy their product until I tested it under
Linux.
It still runs under a Motif windows manager without mouse-wheel support.
Excuse me but I owe my customers more than that.
(Give me a decent GTK Linux interface and I'm right on it.)
I regret that since I love CAPI.


--------------
John Thingstad