From: Robert Haas on 22 Apr 2010 12:20 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(a)hub.org> wrote: > We're discussing scheduling on -core right now, triggered by your email, and > will put out a notice shortly ... although we did just do a back branch > release, we have a second one that has to be done, so we're trying to > balance schedules around doing both, but not simultaneously ... OK, thanks! ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Tom Lane on 23 Apr 2010 11:49 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes: > I think it might be time to think about shipping a beta release. I > guess this is a -core decision, but I can't argue for it there, so > I'll argue for it here. It seems like we're about ready, so maybe we > could plan for a beta, say, a week from now? A bit of discussion among -core and -packagers has not turned up any objections, so we'll plan to wrap beta1 on Thursday 29th for public announcement Monday 5/3. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: RPM script bug #5430 Next: [HACKERS] CTAS not honoring NOT NULL, DEFAULT modifiers |