Prev: Time Travel Re: Misconceptions
Next: Additive Creation Dirac's New Radioactivities and Gamma Ray Bursts Chapt 5 #176; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Bareback Insane O'bungler on 18 Jun 2010 14:57
On May 30, 2:41 pm, zzpat <zzpatr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> CB wrote:
> > "Joe Harrison" <jharrison2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:Xns9D885BA39FE93xyz(a)194.177.98.144...
>
> > > The curse of duh Oboobuh
>
> > On Meet the Putz this am it was said that BP got a clean bill of health just
> > days before the explosion. Inspections were performed by the Oboobuh EPA.
>
> > It was also said that managers routinely cut corners, ignoring alarms,
> > reports of damage and safety.
>
> How bad is [delusional lib-turd-lies flushed]

Bareback Insane Obumbler?
....this buffoon has given a bad name to
all future lazy, incompetent,
unaccomplished, half-white,foreign
born, lying, America-hating ,marxist
frauds who would like to be prsident.
---------
A word on the matter of competence:
Obama is slowly being stripped of any
reputation for ability he may have
accrued during his political career.
The Deepwater Horizon blowout,
the Korea crisis, Iran, Sestak...
Commandant Zero is being revealed
as the most inept president on record.
This is in no way hyperbole;
it is a sober evaluation of the record as it exists.
Fillmore, Buchanan, and even Carter are
simply not in the running here.
As a schlemiel, Obama stands in a
class by himself, a man who not only
can't solve problems, but can't recognize
hem when they appear.
------------------------
left-turds:
....Whatever George W. Bush did or did not do,
he's no longer in office, and doesn't have the
power to do a damn thing about the budget.
Obama is the one who is president with the
really humongous deficits. Deficits of the
size Bush ran are basically sustainable
indefinitely; deficits of the size that
Obama is apparently planning to run,
aren't. If he doesn't change those plans,
he will be the one who led the government
into fiscal crisis, even if changing them
would be [sob!] politically difficult.

I have a serious question for the people
who are mounting this defense:
at what point in his presidency is
Obama actually responsible for
any bad thing that happens?
Two years? Five? Can we pick
a date for when bad things that happen
on Obama's are actually in some measure
the responsibility of one Barack Obama,
rather than his long gone predecessor?
And then stick with that date?
Conversely, can we agree that as long as
the bad things that happen are really
George Bush's fault, any good things
that happen should probably be
chalked up to his administration as well?...

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/02/assigning-blame-for-the-budget-deficit/35649/

Obama will not change. He will not learn from his mistakes.
He will not grow and mature from on-the-job experience.
In fact, over time, Obama will likely become a more
ferocious version of who he is today.

Why? Because this is a damaged person.
Obama's fate was sealed years ago growing up
in his strange and poisonous family. Later on,
his empty vessel was filled with the hateful bile
of men like Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers.

Obama will not evolve; he will not rise to the occasion;
he will not become the man he was meant to be.
This is for one reason and one reason alone:

He is not capable of it.
==============
Most Americans have great difficulty accepting
that they've mindlessly elected an alien,
foreign-born marxist for their chief executive -
bent on a job-destroying purge that will bring
enough social (and economic) disintegration
to make even Karl Marx green with envy .
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Time Travel Re: Misconceptions
Next: Additive Creation Dirac's New Radioactivities and Gamma Ray Bursts Chapt 5 #176; ATOM TOTALITY