Prev: Arrow of Time II
Next: Oh Slider(s) was Re: Easy as pi was Re: To Mars for fun was Re: Beamme slider was Re:The AI Librarian was AI Programation
From: spudnik on 23 Jun 2010 23:08
the point is made that the "current theory
of genesis" is untestable, especially
without a God-am programme d'espace!

>     Or Green cheese.

thus&so:
well, just day, Duh!... as you know, Obama was the lawyer,
who put-together the foundation money to start the CCX
in 2003; free trade, free beer, freedom in a free market,
run by the City of London! (the Carbon Credit Exchange is based
in London; the Intl. Carbon Exchange is HQ'd in Atlanta, but
is juridicially administered in London; etc. ad vomitorium.)

thus&so:
it is quite the fault of Californicators, since I suppose that
we are the #1 customers of Gulf and Alaska oil, because
of a little spill off of Santa Barbara in the Brown Admin. --
and he's bound & determined not to let any knew leases,
as the AG. please, folks; do the God-am math!... and, of course,
we are still using '50s nuclear energy (seven tenths
of the noncarbon-burning electricity in the US , even so .-)

the figure of seeps in teh Gulf,
of one Exxon Valdez per year, was in a cover article,
some years ago, in Scientific American or National Geographic.

thus&so:
it is apparent from the Liberal Media, Owned by consWervatives,
that BP's spill is being used to promote BP's cap&trade nostrum,
to the effect that Waxman-Obama will mandatorize the huge,
voluntary cap&trade in the USA, which is smaller than the EU's,
which is mandatory. so, how did Waxman's '91 cap&trade bill, go,
mister Murdoch -- was it also "cap&tax" a l'Urinal?
http://larouchepub.com/other/2010/3724nuke_brit_sabotage.html

thus&so:
teabagism is based on a false principle,
that the American Revolution was predicated
upon "taxation without representation,"
which was but a tiny corner of the real ecoonomic problem
-- which is exemplified by the so-called Nobel Prize
in Economics, such as the NYTimes columnist got;
there ain't no such a thing, whether or not Klugman knew!

thus&so:
there is one theory, that Moon is a dead planet; that is,
if one does not assume that all craters are via bolides,
that the maria are basaltic seafloors, and the highlands
being the finally acreted "Panluna."
therefore, if residual water is to be found,
mayhap also residual hydrocarbons.
> The vacuum of Moon makes a conventional liquid or fluid impossible.

thus&so:
are not there already several kinds
of "surrogate factoring" in numbertheory ...
is that a demonstration of the meaning Life,
Universe and 42?... yeah; the second Meander number!

thus&so:
that's about what Roemer did (no umlaut
for the o, hereat). note that
Vedic astrology included the precession of the equinoxes,
whereas Western or Symbolic or Solar atrology doesn't;
it is based upon Ptolemy's hoax, which had no epicylce
for that well-known phenomenon. so,
when a typical western astrologer does your sign,
it is no-better than the twelve daily fortune-cookies
in the newspaper -- Sydney Omarr is dead;
long-live Sydney Omarr (TM) !!

> > a + b + c + d = x^2
> > a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2 = y^2
> > a^3+b^3+c^3+d^3 = z^3
> If (a, b, c, d) is a solution then so is (akk, bkk, ckk, dkk) for any square kk.
> Solutions for a,b,c,d < 1300 with no such common square factor include
> (0, 0, 0, 1)
> (10, 13, 14, 44)
> (54, 109, 202, 260)
> (102, 130, 234, 318)

thus&so:
surely it could not be so hard,
to find some of the rather definitive un-null results
of Michelson, Morely et al; is it?... well, even
as Albert the Witnit wobbled on the idea of aether,
it is really a matter of interpretation. so,
why cannot the electromagnetic properties
of atoms in "space" be an aether; to wit,
permitivity & permeability?
should your "theory" can be taken at all seriously,
you'd have to be able to explain such; would you not?
oh, and there never was a twin paradox;
it is just a "term of art" and pop-science. I mean,
shouldn't the few properties of energy, of light,
be of the ultimate importance for matter,
per the experiments of Young, Fresnel et al,
in utterly burying Newton's "theory" of corpuscles
-- til it was rescued by the word, "photon;
hereinat to be interpreted to mean a massless rock
o'light?... and, thanks for that Nobel!"
> Using Larmor’s transform, there is no twin’s paradox.

--BP loves Waxman-Obama cap&trade (at least circa Kyoto, or
Waxman's '91 cap&trade on NOX and SO2) --
how about a tiny tax, instead of the Last Bailout
of Wall Street and the "City of London?"
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100621pne_nordyke.html

--le theoreme prochaine du Fermatttt!
http://wlym.com
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Arrow of Time II
Next: Oh Slider(s) was Re: Easy as pi was Re: To Mars for fun was Re: Beamme slider was Re:The AI Librarian was AI Programation