BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation
in [PgSql]
|
From: Robert Haas on 19 Apr 2010 11:04 On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > Oleg, Teodor, would you look at this? I see the same behavior in 9.0. As there has been no movement on this I think we should punt this from: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items to http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo ....Robert > Alexey Bashtanov wrote: >> >> The following bug has been logged online: >> >> Bug reference: 4887 >> Logged by: Alexey Bashtanov >> Email address: bashtanov(a)imap.cc >> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.1, 8.3.7 >> Operating system: Linux 2.6.20 FC5 i686, Linux 2.6.27 FC10 i686 >> Description: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not >> conforming to documentation >> Details: >> >> Hello! >> >> '!a|b'::tsquery <@ 'a|b'::tsquery evaluates to false, but should evalueate >> to true >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-textsearch.html >> says "The tsquery containment operators consider only the lexemes listed in >> the two queries, ignoring the combining operators.") >> >> I think negation operator is treated as a lexeme. So please correct the >> behaviour of operators or rewrite this line of docs. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexey >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs(a)postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs > > -- > Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas on 20 Apr 2010 12:33 On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> wrote: >> > Oleg, Teodor, would you look at this? ?I see the same behavior in 9.0. >> >> As there has been no movement on this I think we should punt this from: >> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items >> >> to >> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo > > Agreed, though I am disappointed because I thought Oleg and Teodor were > going to look at this bug. Moved. ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [HACKERS] perltidy Next: Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrectenvironment |