From: Merciadri Luca on
Hi,

I have two BWS688 transmitters for one BWS688 receptor. One BWS688
transmitter works, but the other does not work. This is not a range
question, as even if the BWS688 is placed very close to the main
station (receptor), its signal is never received (or at least
interpreted in some way). This is not a battery problem: I checked
with new batteries. The red `RF REMOTE SENSOR' lamp lightens from time
to time, just as with the other transmitter.

Thanks.
From: Meat Plow on
On Tue, 18 May 2010 10:27:41 -0700, Merciadri Luca wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have two BWS688 transmitters for one BWS688 receptor. One BWS688
> transmitter works, but the other does not work. This is not a range
> question, as even if the BWS688 is placed very close to the main station
> (receptor), its signal is never received (or at least interpreted in
> some way). This is not a battery problem: I checked with new batteries.
> The red `RF REMOTE SENSOR' lamp lightens from time to time, just as with
> the other transmitter.
>
> Thanks.

Sorry to hear one BWS688 isn't working.
From: Merciadri Luca on
On May 18, 7:44 pm, Meat Plow <mhyw...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sorry to hear one BWS688 isn't working.

Huh? That does not bring some new info to the topic. I'm sorry too,
but that does not take us further.
From: Meat Plow on
On Tue, 18 May 2010 10:49:02 -0700, Merciadri Luca wrote:

> On May 18, 7:44 pm, Meat Plow <mhyw...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Sorry to hear one BWS688 isn't working.
>
> Huh? That does not bring some new info to the topic. I'm sorry too, but
> that does not take us further.

Oh,you wanted to go further? I just thought you were describing some
equipment you had and how it did or didn't operate. What further did you
want to know?
From: Merciadri Luca on
On May 18, 7:53 pm, Meat Plow <mhyw...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2010 10:49:02 -0700, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> > On May 18, 7:44 pm, Meat Plow <mhyw...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry to hear one BWS688 isn't working.
>
> > Huh? That does not bring some new info to the topic. I'm sorry too, but
> > that does not take us further.
>
> Oh,you wanted to go further? I just thought you were describing some
> equipment you had and how it did or didn't operate. What further did you
> want to know?

Why it does not work...