From: RichA on 16 May 2010 19:20 On May 16, 4:25 am, "N" <N...(a)onyx.com> wrote: > "RichA" <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:d73ad005-c9b1-427a-8c78-6e605cc6069f(a)e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On May 14, 7:29 am, "N" <N...(a)onyx.com> wrote: > >> "Rich" <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message > > >>news:dPadnYLij-_qC3HWnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > > >> > Check out the tests on the Ricoh with the back-illuminated sensor. It > >> > is > >> > a > >> > PIECE OF JUNK for any ISO over 200, which is NO surprise. Current > >> > sensors > >> > are not inefficient. Not NEARLY so much as the nuts hyping back > >> > illumination are pretending. Does back illumination work, at all? Yes, > >> > it > >> > can, but not with TINY, CRAPPY sensors like the "dime a dozen" 1/2.3.." > >> > Back illumination might be interesting on a bigger sensor, and it is > >> > viable > >> > for scientific CCDs with huge pixels, but for now, you can't make a > >> > silk > >> > purse out of a sow's ear no matter what tricks you try. > > >> What's your opinion of a Nikon P100? > > >> -- > >> N > > > Haven't seen it yet, I'll check it out though. > > It's getting bad reviews. > > -- > N I thought all Nikon P&S's did? It's not their forte, at least now. Back in 2001 or so, Nikon (990/995), Olympus(C3040) and Maybe Minolta produced the best P&S's and Kodak ruled the largest market share.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Two camera shows in Toronto this weekend Next: Steve Jobs: Funniest line of the decade |