Back up program
in [Windows XP Users]
|
From: Jack on 28 Feb 2010 14:11 "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message news:#DJHODKuKHA.4220(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > If Acronis could also perform true cloning operations it would be on an > even footing with Ghost, It does. Perhaps you just missed that capability in TI?
From: ENS9CVH on 27 Feb 2010 17:28 Ask your m u m my t roll!! Men's C 0 c k s haven't changed for centuries! Unknown wrote: > > Are you nuts? Technologies don't even resemble what they were 20 years ago. >
From: Unknown on 28 Feb 2010 18:09 How is it that you notoriously promote all the garbage one can install on a computer? Registry cleaners, Norton products, etc. "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message news:%23DJHODKuKHA.4220(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > In news:6v8lo559j55uf6qruq0i25vv0bv9nj6f9b(a)4ax.com, > Ken Blake, MVP <kblake(a)this.is.an.invalid.domain> typed: >> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:58:58 +0000, EN59CVH >> <EN59CVH(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >>> If the data is extremely important than clearly you can't rely on a >>> free program. You would do yourself justice if you spend a few bob >>> on Norton Ghost 15 that is tried and tested for over 20 years or >>> more since the DOS days. >> >> >> I completely disagree with both things you say above: >> >> 1. Your view that a freeware program is necessarily less reliable than >> one you have to pay for. >> >> 2. Your view that any Norton product is more reliable than any of its >> competitors. >> >> My recommendation is stay as far away as possible from all Norton >> products. > > Which is precisely why many of youre "recommendations" fall on deaf ears. > Norton Ghost is one of the best imaging setups you'll find and posesses a > host of useful bells & whistles. Acronis True Image is as good and just > as reliable for imaging with only a few things Ghost can do that are > missing, and one or two things Ghost can't do. If Acronis could also > perform true cloning operations it would be on an even footing with Ghost, > in fact. I have Ghost and other 2009/2010 verstions of Norton on this > machine and TI on the Dell dual xeos server behind me. As is legally > allowed, Ghost is also installed on two other machines here, both laptops. > TI is only on one machine. Neither has ever had a problem with > storing/restoreing drive images. > You need to come up to speed with the real world, you really do. > > HTH, > > Twayne > > > >> >> >> >>> Dirk wrote: >>>> >>>> Im looking for a free data back up program that will only back up >>>> the files that have changed since the previous back up. >>>> Any suggestions >>>> Thank you > > > > -- > -- > Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered > through personal experience does not become a > part of the moral tissue.
From: Bill in Co. on 28 Feb 2010 18:19 Because he likes to test out as many hard drives as possible for backup restoration capabilities? Unknown wrote: > How is it that you notoriously promote all the garbage one can install on > a > computer? > > Registry cleaners, Norton products, etc. > "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message > news:%23DJHODKuKHA.4220(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> In news:6v8lo559j55uf6qruq0i25vv0bv9nj6f9b(a)4ax.com, >> Ken Blake, MVP <kblake(a)this.is.an.invalid.domain> typed: >>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:58:58 +0000, EN59CVH >>> <EN59CVH(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >>> >>>> If the data is extremely important than clearly you can't rely on a >>>> free program. You would do yourself justice if you spend a few bob >>>> on Norton Ghost 15 that is tried and tested for over 20 years or >>>> more since the DOS days. >>> >>> >>> I completely disagree with both things you say above: >>> >>> 1. Your view that a freeware program is necessarily less reliable than >>> one you have to pay for. >>> >>> 2. Your view that any Norton product is more reliable than any of its >>> competitors. >>> >>> My recommendation is stay as far away as possible from all Norton >>> products. >> >> Which is precisely why many of youre "recommendations" fall on deaf ears. >> Norton Ghost is one of the best imaging setups you'll find and posesses a >> host of useful bells & whistles. Acronis True Image is as good and just >> as reliable for imaging with only a few things Ghost can do that are >> missing, and one or two things Ghost can't do. If Acronis could also >> perform true cloning operations it would be on an even footing with >> Ghost, >> in fact. I have Ghost and other 2009/2010 verstions of Norton on this >> machine and TI on the Dell dual xeos server behind me. As is legally >> allowed, Ghost is also installed on two other machines here, both >> laptops. >> TI is only on one machine. Neither has ever had a problem with >> storing/restoreing drive images. >> You need to come up to speed with the real world, you really do. >> >> HTH, >> >> Twayne >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Dirk wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Im looking for a free data back up program that will only back up >>>>> the files that have changed since the previous back up. >>>>> Any suggestions >>>>> Thank you >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered >> through personal experience does not become a >> part of the moral tissue.
From: Twayne on 28 Feb 2010 20:54 In news:3ezin.370$cp7.357(a)newsfe23.iad, Jack <nospam(a)invalid.not> typed: > "Twayne" <nobody(a)spamcop.net> wrote in message > news:#DJHODKuKHA.4220(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >> If Acronis could also perform true cloning operations it would be on >> an even footing with Ghost, > > It does. Perhaps you just missed that capability in TI? Umm, apparently I did! I know the version I tested didn't, and I've seen similar posts here indicating the same thing and last time I looked I couldn't find anything on their site about cloning drives. Thanks for the update - I'll have another look. Regards, Twayne` -- -- Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered through personal experience does not become a part of the moral tissue.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Ie8 and Youtube Next: XP Issues - system doesn't see keyboard |