From: John Pollard on 9 Apr 2010 10:06 Bartt wrote: > On Apr 8, 11:05 am, "John Pollard" <8plus7...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Bartt wrote: >>> On Apr 3, 9:01 am, "John Pollard" <8plus7...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Oilcan wrote: >>>>> I have direct connect on my last remaining BofA card (they forgot >>>>> to remove it when I transferred my accounts to another FI). I get >>>>> the transaction when it post to their system and I also get it >>>>> when the statement closes. The second transaction will not match >>>>> which means it must have a different transaction id being sent to >>>>> me >> >>>> If the second transaction had the same Financial Institution >>>> Transaction ID as the first, you should never see it at all: >>>> Quicken compares FITID's and doesn't display downloaded >>>> transactions whose FITID has already been Accepted into your >>>> Quicken data. >> >>>> You can verify for yourself by either saving the OFXlogs from both >>>> downloads and comparing the FITID's of the two transactions; or by >>>> using the QELLOG facility to display your current FITID's and check >>>> the FITID in the OFXlog from the second download to see if you >>>> already have it. >> >>>> http://quicken.intuit.com/support/articles/getting-started/setting-up... >> >>>> -- >> >>>> John Pollard >>>> news://<YOUR-NNTP-NEWSERVER-HERE>/alt.comp.software.financial.quicken >>>> Your source of user-to-user Quicken help >> >>> A couple of things: >>> 1) What do you use to view the OFXLOG file? I tried to use NotePad, >>> but that doesn't work. >> >> You can view the OFXlog in Quicken: >> >> Help > Product and Customer Support > OFXlog >> >> But often it is easier to use an editor, or word processor (like >> Word); especially if your financial institution doesn't format the >> OFX nicely. To do that, "Save" the OFXlog while in Quicken ... that >> will create a Windows .txt file of the log, which you can then work >> with in an editor or word processor. >> >>> 2) I generated a QELLOG file & I can see at least one example where >>> a x'action appears in the file twice. I'm not an expert in analysis >>> of the info, but both appear to have the same FITID. There are some >>> slight variations in the info in the records, but they're very >>> close. One has a status "new" and the other is "processed" >> >> I haven't worked with the QELLOG to any meaningful degree, just >> generated a couple and took a quick look. >> >> My understanding is that there should not be two exactly equal >> FITID's for the same account with the same fi, in your Quicken data >> ... not even one in your account register and the other in the >> "Accept transactions ...." window. An FITID that is already in your >> data should prevent any transaction from the same fi for the same >> account, with that FITID, from ever getting as far as the "Accept >> transactions ...." window. It may be in the downloaded data >> (OFXlog), but it shouldn't appear in Quicken. >> >> I don't know what the distinction between "new" and "processed" in >> QELLOG represents in Quicken. If the FITID's (or accounts, or fi's) >> were different, I might think one transaction had already been >> "Accepted" ("processed"), and the other was in the "Accept >> transactions ..." window as a "New" transaction. But I'd just be >> guessing. Do you have an account where you have accepted some of the >> downloaded transactions, but there are still others which you have >> not yet "processed"? >> >> If you note the data in each QELLOG transaction, I would think you >> could locate the two transactions in your Quicken data ... and see >> what relationship they have to each other. >> >> If you were willing to post the data from the two transactions with >> the same FITID, in the Quicken Live Community (you could probably >> scrub any truly sensitive information first), the post might get >> Intuit's attention. You could provide the background of your >> original post in this discussion, explain you ran QELLOG and say you >> didn't think there should be two transactions in your Quicken data >> from the same account at the same financial institution with the >> same FITID, and ask what the meaning of "new" and "processed" is. >> Intuit might answer, and you and quite a few other people could get >> some useful info. Or not. >> >> -- >> >> John Pollard >> news://<YOUR-NNTP-NEWSERVER-HERE>/alt.comp.software.financial.quicken >> Your source of user-to-user Quicken help- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > OK. I've got about 1/2 dozen x'actions waiting to be "Accepted" that > have Matched against x'actions that I manually posted. > > I've saved my OFXLOG as it exists today. > > Do you recommend Accepting the downloaded x'actions & waiting until > the dups show up when my statement closes, or should I leave them in > the pending window? I'd be inclined to Accept the existing transactions, and look at things again after the dups show up. > On another side note, a day or two after I posted here, I posted this > issue in the Quicken Community Q&A, under "Downloading and managing > your accounts and transactions". Is that what you're talking about > when you say "Quicken Live Community"? I wasn't impressed w/ > Quicken's Q&A. It assumes that a "reply" means the question has been > "answered" & doesn't lend itself to dialogue. The most a poster can > do is attach some comments, unless I'm missing something... I don't know anyone who likes the Live Community user interface. It is definitely not friendly to "dialog" ... but one works around the problem. The user who initiates a "reply" decides whether they think they have an "answer" or just want to make a "comment". The user who asked the question can mark an answer as having "solved" the problem, just been "helpful", or do nothing. Other users, may decide to award a point to an answer that they like. -- John Pollard news://<YOUR-NNTP-NEWSERVER-HERE>/alt.comp.software.financial.quicken Your source of user-to-user Quicken help
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Certificates of Deposit (CD's) Next: importing from MSmoney to quicken has been a nightmare |