From: David Bernier on
John Fields wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:20:38 +0100, Sjouke Burry
> <burrynulnulfour(a)ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:
>
>> Magnetic wrote:
>>> On Feb 22, 11:13 pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:26:28 -0800 (PST), Magnetic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> Now,now, where are your apologies for your failed
>> doom shouting?
>> Or are you following the crooks way of changing the story,
>> hoping nobody notices?
>
> ---
> "Crook" is exactly right.
>
> He's now moving the goalposts by stating that, statistically, he can't
> be wrong unless nothing bad happens, ever, and it's up to everyone to
> wait, forever, for the proof.
>
> JF

I downloaded a PDF book from a site mentioned by Magnetic, but consider
the book to be 90% fluff or repetition, at best (it's probably worse).

There's one law review article by Eric E. Johnson that's
at least quite interesting, from reading three pages of it.

It discusses the petition for a preliminary injunction against
CERN filed by ??? and what followed.

Eric E. Johnson:
"The Black-Hole Case: The Injunction Against the End of the World",
76 Tennessee Law Review 819 (2009) [ 90 pages, PDF file ]
< http://www.eejlaw.com/ >

David Bernier

From: David Bernier on
David Bernier wrote:
[...]

> There's one law review article by Eric E. Johnson that's
> at least quite interesting, from reading three pages of it.
>
> It discusses the petition for a preliminary injunction against
> CERN filed by ??? and what followed.

The petition or application is entitled as follows:

Sancho v. U.S. Department of Energy et al, // Title
filed in the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii on March 21 2008.

David Bernier


> Eric E. Johnson:
> "The Black-Hole Case: The Injunction Against the End of the World",
> 76 Tennessee Law Review 819 (2009) [ 90 pages, PDF file ]
> < http://www.eejlaw.com/ >