Bigbang, a fantasy?
in [Relativity]
|
From: mluttgens on 5 Jan 2010 19:32 See http://www.spacetelescope.org/new/htmeheic1007.html Marcel Luttgens
From: mluttgens on 5 Jan 2010 19:40 On 6 jan, 01:32, mluttgens <mluttg...(a)orange.fr> wrote: > Seehttp://www.spacetelescope.org/new/htmeheic1007.html > > Marcel Luttgens Sorry, see http:// www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic1001.html
From: mluttgens on 5 Jan 2010 19:44 On 6 jan, 01:40, mluttgens <mluttg...(a)orange.fr> wrote: > On 6 jan, 01:32, mluttgens <mluttg...(a)orange.fr> wrote: > > > Seehttp://www.spacetelescope.org/new/htmeheic1007.html > > > Marcel Luttgens > > Sorry, see http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic1001.html OK
From: eric gisse on 5 Jan 2010 20:36 mluttgens wrote: > On 6 jan, 01:40, mluttgens <mluttg...(a)orange.fr> wrote: >> On 6 jan, 01:32, mluttgens <mluttg...(a)orange.fr> wrote: >> >> > Seehttp://www.spacetelescope.org/new/htmeheic1007.html >> >> > Marcel Luttgens >> >> Sorry, see http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic1001.html > > OK And you think the existence of galaxies renders the big bang a fantasy because...?
From: Inertial on 5 Jan 2010 21:53
"mluttgens" <mluttgens(a)orange.fr> wrote in message news:a358ff50-d882-4c86-8b60-e35d5e2e3f2d(a)j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... > On 6 jan, 01:40, mluttgens <mluttg...(a)orange.fr> wrote: >> On 6 jan, 01:32, mluttgens <mluttg...(a)orange.fr> wrote: >> >> > Seehttp://www.spacetelescope.org/new/htmeheic1007.html >> >> > Marcel Luttgens >> >> Sorry, see http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic1001.html > > OK There's nothing there to suggest the big bang is a fantasy. **IF** they had found images of galaxies that were older than when the big-bang was supposed to have happened, then **that** would mean at least that the date of the big bang was wrong. But they didnt. The only fantasy is you thinking you see something in there that discredits big-bang theory. |