Prev: 6th factor: Fat Albert and the Expanding Universe
Next: Transocean says rig wellhead passed tests ahead of Gulf blast
From: jimp on 31 May 2010 16:24
In sci.physics deadrat <a(a)b.com> wrote:
> jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Bret Cahill <BretCahill(a)peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Pressure sensors are good to five or 6 decimal places.
>>>
>>> Instead BP was off by several _orders of magnitude_.
>>>
>>> The excuse for that "error" or "omission" does not exist.
>>
>> Even if true, why should anyone be spending any effort whatsoever to
>> instrument the flow?
>>
>> The problem is that it IS flowing and the objective is to STOP it as soon
>> as possible, not do science experiments.
>
> Do ya suppose that the flow rate might have something to do with engineering
> the proper solution for stopping (or even STOPPING) the leak, genius?

Little to none, drooler.

>> I suppose if your house catches fire you are going to be running around
>> installing sensors to quantify the fire instead of working on putting it
>> out?
>
> Do ya suppose that the leak might be nothing like a fire at your house,
> genius?

Do you suppose you have totally missed the point, drooler?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: 6th factor: Fat Albert and the Expanding Universe
Next: Transocean says rig wellhead passed tests ahead of Gulf blast